Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Editor's Picks
    • Special Series: Sponsored Minireviews and Video Abstracts
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Novel Systems Biology Techniques
    • Early-Career Systems Microbiology Perspectives
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About mSystems
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSystems
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Editor's Picks
    • Special Series: Sponsored Minireviews and Video Abstracts
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Novel Systems Biology Techniques
    • Early-Career Systems Microbiology Perspectives
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About mSystems
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

Gut Microbiota and Host Thermoregulation in Response to Ambient Temperature Fluctuations

Saeid Khakisahneh, Xue-Ying Zhang, Zahra Nouri, De-Hua Wang
Thomas J. Sharpton, Editor
Saeid Khakisahneh
aState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
bCAS Center for Excellence in Biotic Interactions, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xue-Ying Zhang
aState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
bCAS Center for Excellence in Biotic Interactions, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Xue-Ying Zhang
Zahra Nouri
aState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
bCAS Center for Excellence in Biotic Interactions, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
De-Hua Wang
aState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
bCAS Center for Excellence in Biotic Interactions, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas J. Sharpton
Oregon State University
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00514-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Ambient temperature (Ta) is an important factor in shaping phenotypic plasticity. Plasticity is generally beneficial for animals in adapting to their environments. Gut microbiota are crucial in regulating host physiological and behavioral processes. However, whether the gut microbiota play a role in regulating host phenotypic plasticity under the conditions of repeated fluctuations in environmental factors has rarely been examined. We used intermittent Ta acclimations to test the hypothesis that the plasticity of gut microbiota confers on the host a metabolic adaptation to Ta fluctuations. Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) were acclimated to intermittent 5°C to 23°C, 37°C to 23°C or 23°C to 23°C conditions for 3 cycles (totally 3 months). Intermittent Ta acclimations induced variations in resting metabolic rate (RMR), serum thyroid hormones, and core body temperature (Tb). We further identified that the β-diversity of the microbial community varied with Ta and showed diverse responses during the 3 cycles. Some specific bacteria were more sensitive to Ta and were associated with host dynamic metabolic plasticity during Ta acclimations. In addition, depletion of gut microbiota in antibiotic-treated gerbils impaired metabolic plasticity, particularly at low Ta, whereas supplementation with propionate as an energy resource improved the inhibited thermogenic capacity and increased the survival rate in the cold. These findings demonstrate that both gut microbiota and their host were more adaptive after repeated acclimations, and dynamic gut microbiota and their metabolites may confer host plasticity in thermoregulation in response to Ta fluctuations. It also implies that low Ta is a crucial cue in driving symbiosis between mammals and their gut microbiota during evolution.

IMPORTANCE Whether gut microbiota play a role in regulating host phenotypic plasticity in small mammals living in seasonal environments has rarely been examined. The present study, through an intermittent temperature acclimation model, indicates that both gut microbiota and their host were more adaptive after repeated acclimations. It also demonstrates that dynamic gut microbiota confer host plasticity in thermoregulation in response to intermittent temperature fluctuations. Furthermore, low temperature seems to be a crucial cue in driving the symbiosis between mammals and their gut microbiota during evolution.

INTRODUCTION

Phenotypic plasticity is a vital adaptation of organisms to complex, variable environments, and it determines the fitness and distribution range of species (1, 2). Ambient temperature (Ta) is an important factor for shaping phenotypic plasticity in small mammals in the temperate and Arctic regions, which are characterized by fluctuating Ta (3). A critical physiological adaptive strategy to cope with Ta fluctuations for small mammals is a changing metabolic rate (4, 5). Small mammal species distributed in different latitudes and habitats exhibit diverse phenotypic variations in response to high and low Ta values. For example, desert rodents usually have a wide thermal neutral zone (TNZ) to cope with winter or cold conditions (5, 6). Hibernating mammals reduce metabolic rate and hibernate to survive the cold season (7). External environment cues, such as Ta and/or photoperiod, can be perceived and transformed into neuronal signaling and induce changes in thyroid hormones and leptin that can meditate metabolic adjustments (8, 9).

Increasing evidence indicates that microorganisms residing in the gut have essential metabolic and immunological functions for the adaptation of their host species (10). It has been demonstrated previously that changes in relative abundances of some microbial taxa can change digestibility of the diet and the amount of energy harvested for the host species (11–13). Additionally, bacterial metabolites act as paracrine or endocrine factors and have a marked effect in regulating energy metabolism in host species (14). Various factors such as season, altitude, diet, and photoperiod have been reported to have an impact on the diversity of gut microbial communities in small mammals. For example, marked seasonal fluctuations in microbial communities were observed in wild mice (15) and hibernating ground squirrels (Ictidomys tridecemlineatus and Urocitellus parryii) on an annual basis (7, 16). However, the effects of increased or decreased Ta on gut microbial community structure were reported mainly in invertebrates or ectotherms (17, 18). Only a few studies have reported cold-induced variation in gut microbial communities in laboratory mice and Brandt’s voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii) (19–21). There are no data on the response of gut microbiota and their relationship with metabolic plasticity in mammal species exposed to frequent high or low Ta in the context of global climate change.

The Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus), a rodent species in semiarid steppes, desert grasslands, and agricultural fields of northern China, Mongolia, and the Trans-Baikal region of Russia, faces high fluctuations in annual Ta (range from −47.5°C to 35.3°C) in its habitat and possesses a wide TNZ (26.5°C to 38.9°C) (22). These gerbils exhibited seasonal physiological plasticity in energy intake, resting metabolic rate (RMR), and nonshivering thermogenesis (NST) in the face of seasonal environmental changes, particularly in Ta (4, 23). They also show seasonal behavioral plasticity, such as breeding and food hoarding in natural habitats (24, 25). It was reported that gut microbiota were involved in cold- or huddling-induced thermoregulation in wild small mammals (20). However, we have a major knowledge gap about whether the gut microbiota play a role in beneficial phenotypic plasticity. We used the intermittent Ta acclimation to test the hypothesis that the plasticity in the gut microbiota confers host metabolic adaptation to Ta fluctuations. We first examined the effects of periodic high- and low-Ta acclimation on the diversity and composition of the gut microbial community, as well as the corresponding changes in thyroid hormones and metabolic regulation. In addition, we determined the role of the gut microbiota in conferring host metabolic benefit for survival at a high or low Ta.

RESULTS

Dynamic changes in metabolic phenotypes during intermittent high- and low-Ta acclimations.To test the responses to intermittent temperature variations, adult Mongolian gerbils were acclimated to intermittent 23°C to 23°C (C), 37°C to 23°C (HC) and 5°C to 23°C (LC) conditions (26) (Fig. 1a). Body mass was not influenced by intermittent Ta manipulation [F(2, 20) = 0.565, P = 0.577; Fig. 1b]. Food intake increased (by 60% in the first and 57% in the last exposure) in LC gerbils and decreased (by 53% in the first and 38% in the last exposure) in the HC group compared to the control group [F(2, 24) = 34.927, P < 0.001; Fig. 1c]. RMR increased by 30% in the 8th week and by 27% in the 12th week in LC and decreased by 37% in the first and 39% in the last in HC [8th week, F(2, 12) = 4.494, P = 0.035; 12th week, F(2, 12) = 4.652, P = 0.032] (Fig. 1d). Core body temperature (Tb) fluctuated with time [F(80, 640) = 4.145, P < 0.001] and was affected by group [F(2, 8) = 10.231, P = 0.006] and the interaction of time and group [F(160, 640) = 10.770, P < 0.001; Fig. 1e]. Tb values were 1.3°C higher in the gerbils exposed to the 3rd period of 37°C and 0.7°C lower in those exposed to the 3rd period of 5°C than in 23°C (Fig. 1e). Both T3 and the T3/T4 ratio increased in the periods of 5°C and decreased in the periods of 37°C, and they returned to control levels after acclimation to 23°C (Fig. 1f and g). The propionic acid concentration increased in LC and decreased in HC compared with the control in the 4th [F(2, 27) = 7.622, P = 0.003], 8th [F(2, 21) = 10.859, P = 0.001], and 12th weeks [F(2, 22) = 5.020, P = 0.017], and returned to control levels in the 6th [F(2, 22) = 2.223, P = 0.133] and 10th weeks [F(2, 22) = 0.640, P = 0.538; Fig. 1h]. Other short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) did not differ among groups during acclimation (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

The plasticity of metabolic phenotypes and metabolites during intermittent temperature acclimations in Mongolian gerbils. (a) Schematic overview of experimental design. (b) Body mass monitoring. (c) Food intake. (d) Resting metabolic rate (RMR). (e) Core body temperature (Tb). (f, g) Serum T3 and the T3/T4 ratio. (h) Concentration of propionic acid. Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *, P < 0.05 for LC versus control. #, P < 0.05 for HC versus control.

TABLE S1

Changes in short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs; μg/g) during intermittent temperature acclimations. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences among groups (P < 0.05). C, maintained at 23°C; HC, acclimated to periodic 37° and 23°C; LC, acclimated to periodic 5°C and 23°C. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Khakisahneh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

RMR was correlated positively with food intake and T3/T4 during intermittent high-Ta acclimation (in the HC group but not in the LC or C groups; see Tables S2 to S4 and Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), and correlated positively with the concentrations of propionic acid, acetic acid, butyric acid, and valeric acid during intermittent low-Ta acclimation (Table S4; Fig. S1). The T3/T4 ratio was correlated positively with food intake and propionic acid concentration during intermittent high- and low-Ta acclimations (Tables S3 and S4; Fig. S1).

FIG S1

Pearson correlation between physiological parameters. Correlations between resting metabolic rate (RMR) and (a) food intake, (b) T3/T4 ratio, (c) propionic acid, and (d) acetic acid, and between T3/T4 ratio and (e) food intake and (f) propionic acid. C, maintained at 23°C; HC, acclimated to periodic 37° and 23°C; LC, acclimated to periodic 5°C and 23°C. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 0.6 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Khakisahneh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Correlations between physiological parameters and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) at 23°C. *, Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **, Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Khakisahneh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Correlations between physiological parameters and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) during intermittent 37°C acclimations. *, Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **, Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Khakisahneh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S4

Correlations between physiological parameters and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) during intermittent 5°C acclimations. *, Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **, Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Download Table S4, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Khakisahneh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Dynamic microbial diversity during intermittent high- and low-Ta acclimations.To identify whether the gut microbiota exhibited dynamic variations in response to intermittent-Ta acclimation, we analyzed 16S rRNA gene sequences from fecal samples at different time points. The sequencing resulted in a total of 4,887,962 valid reads and identified 107,420 unique operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a threshold of 97% sequence identity. The sequence number per sample was 31,740 ± 1,640. The rarefaction curve of Goods coverage for all samples reached saturation (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), indicating that most bacteria were identified in this study. The diversity and richness of gut microbiota (α-diversity) fluctuated during intermittent temperature treatment (Fig. 2a and b; see also Table S5 in the supplemental material), but evident group differences were found in the 3rd acclimation period (12th week), with significant increases in phylogenetic diversity (PD) whole-tree and Chao1 levels in the LC compared to those in the HC group (Fig. 2a and b and Table S5). The principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) graphs clearly illustrated separation of the microbial community (β-diversity) among different groups, especially in the first period (4th week, analysis of similarity [ANOSIM], R = 0.384, P = 0.001) and second period (8th week, ANOSIM, R = 0.248, P = 0.001) of acclimation at 5°C or 37°C. After the third (12th week, ANOSIM, R = 0.397, P = 0.001) intermittent acclimation, β-diversity of the HC (37°C) group showed a complete separation from the control group (C) (23°C) and LC (5°C) groups, whereas the clusters of the latter two groups overlapped (Fig. 2c). The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) method with an LDA score of >2 identified differential biomarkers at the genus level in fecal microbial community of different groups in weeks 4, 8, and 12 of Ta acclimation (Fig. 2d and e).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Dynamic changes in the diversity and structure of gut microbial community during intermittent temperature acclimations. (a) Phylogenetic diversity (PD) whole-tree analysis and (b) Chao1 index for the samples. Different letters indicate significant differences among groups (P < 0.05). (c) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis distance between the samples in weeks 4, 8, and 12 of Ta acclimation. (d) The plot was generated using the LEfSe tool. The bar plots represent the significantly differential taxa at the genus level among groups, based on effect size (LDA score [log 10], >2). (e) Cladogram representing taxa at the genus level enriched in fecal microbial community of the groups detected by the LEfSe tool. The circle’s diameter is proportional to the taxon’s abundance.

FIG S2

The rarefaction curve of Goods coverage for all fecal samples. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.06 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Khakisahneh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S5

Alpha diversity, including Chao1, observed OTUs, Shannon index, and phylogenetic diversity (PD) whole-tree in different groups under intermittent temperature acclimations. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences among groups (P < 0.05). C, maintained at 23°C; HC, acclimated to periodic 37° and 23°C; LC, acclimated to periodic 5°C and 23°C. Download Table S5, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Khakisahneh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Fluctuating patterns of relative abundances of the top 18 representative genera were observed, particularly for the HC group during intermittent acclimation (Fig. 3a). The relative abundances of Blautia and Lactobacillus spp. increased in both the first and second periods at 37°C acclimation compared to the control (P < 0.001; Fig. 3b). The relative abundances of Butyricimonas and Ruminococcus spp. were higher during all the periods of 37°C acclimation (P < 0.001; Fig. 3b). The relative abundance of Oscillospira increased significantly only in the first time of 37°C acclimation compared to the control [F(2, 25) = 10.136, P = 0.001], and showed no change in 5°C-exposed gerbils (Fig. 3b). The relative abundance of Roseburia increased at 5°C only in the third period of acclimation [12th week, F(2, 21) = 3.978, P = 0.036; Fig. 3b].

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Dynamic changes in the proportion of specific bacteria under intermittent high and low ambient temperature (Ta). (a) The fluctuating patterns of different taxa of the top 18 representative genera during intermittent acclimation in C (23°C to 23°C), HC (37°C to 23°C), and LC (5°C to 23°C) groups. (b) Relative abundance of different bacteria at the genus level during the acclimation time. Data are presented as means ± SEM. *, P < 0.05 versus control.

We further analyzed the correlations between bacterial taxa and metabolic phenotypes by Pearson correlation analyses for the control (Fig. 4a), HC (Fig. 4b), and LC (Fig. 4c) groups during all acclimation periods. Some specific bacteria, such as Butyricimonas, Lactobacillus, and Oscillospira were correlated negatively with the T3/T4 ratio, and Parabacteroides was correlated negatively with food intake during intermittent 37°C acclimation (Fig. 4b). The bacterial taxa of Coprococcus, Dehalobacterium, Desulfovibrio, Oscillospira, and Ruminococcus were correlated positively with RMR, and the taxa of Ruminococcus were correlated positively with food intake under intermittent 5°C acclimation (Fig. 4c).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Heatmap of correlations between operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and physiological parameters. (a) Pearson correlation in the C group (23°C to 23°C), (b) Pearson correlation in the HC group (37°C to 23°C), (C) Pearson correlation in the LC group (5°C to 23°C). The OTU identifiers (IDs) with only numbers were from the Greengenes database, whereas those with the letters were clustered into de novo OTUs. ***, false-discovery rate (FDR)-corrected P < 0.001.

Metabolic phenotypes and gut microbial diversity in antibiotic-treated gerbils in response to high or low Ta.To verify the role of gut microbiota for host defense in low or high Ta, an antibiotic cocktail was administered via intragastric gavage, and the animals were acclimated to high or low Ta (Fig. 5a). Following antibiotic administration, body mass dropped in gerbils except in those that received propionate (Ab-LProp group) [F(4, 33) = 3.037, P = 0.031; Fig. 5b]. Food intake was lower in antibiotic recipients than in the control group [F(4, 29) = 7.549, P < 0.001; Fig. 5c]. During 5°C acclimation, food intake was 77% higher in the Ab-L and 111% higher in the Ab-LProp groups than their initial levels before Ta acclimation, and it was 54% lower in the gerbils acclimated to 37°C [F(6, 132) = 2.485, P = 0.026; Fig. 5c]. Compared to the control group, all gerbils that were treated with antibiotics reduced RMR by 45% [F(4, 25) = 6.375, P = 0.001; Fig. 5d]. Treatment with antibiotics resulted in significant reductions in the maximum nonshivering thermogenesis (NSTmax) [F(4, 25) = 10.484, P < 0.001] and the regulatory NST (NSTreg) [F(4, 25) = 9.929, P < 0.001]. During cold stimulation, the Ab-LProp gerbils had higher NSTmax and NSTreg values than the Ab-L group (Fig. 5d). Tb decreased from 36.8°C ± 0.6°C to 34.2°C ± 0.6°C after 1 week of antibiotic treatment and then remained stable (Fig. 5e). The Ab-H gerbils had the same Tb as the control (P > 0.05), but the Ab-L gerbils reduced Tb to 33.2°C ± 0.7°C 4 days after exposure to 5°C [F(4, 18) = 14.01, P < 0.001; Fig. 5e], and the survival rate dropped to 50% 1 week after cold exposure (Fig. 5F). However, the Ab-LProp gerbils maintained a stable Tb (35.8°C ± 0.4°C), and no animal died during cold acclimation (Fig. 5e and f).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Energy metabolism, body temperature and survival rate in antibiotic-treated gerbils during different Ta acclimations. (a) Schematic overview of experimental design. (b) Body mass. (c) Food intake. (d) Resting metabolic rate (RMR), maximum nonshivering thermogenesis (NSTmax) and regulatory NST (NSTreg). (e) Core body temperature (Tb). (f) Survival rate. Data are presented as means ± SEM. *, P < 0.05, Ab, Ab-H, and Ab-L versus control (b), Ab, Ab-H, Ab-L, and Ab-LProp versus control (c), or Ab, Ab-L, and Ab-LProp versus control (e). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences among groups (P < 0.05).

Following antibiotic treatment, digestible energy intake (DEI) differed among groups [F(4, 29) = 25.312, P < 0.001; Fig. 6a; see also Table S6 in the supplemental material]. DEI increased in the Ab-L group (post hoc, P < 0.001) and decreased in the Ab-H gerbils (post hoc, P < 0.001) compared with that in the Ab animals, and DEI in the Ab gerbils supplemented with propionate at 5°C (Ab-Lprop) was lower than that in the Ab-L group (P = 0.015). Antibiotic treatment independent of Ta led to a reduced diet digestibility [F(4, 29) = 5.641, P = 0.002; Fig. 6b]. Serum T3 levels also differed among groups [F(4, 28) = 10.706, P < 0.001; Fig. 6c]. Ab-L gerbils had higher (P = 0.002) and Ab-H had lower (P = 0.017) serum T3 levels than the Ab group. Serum T4 levels were lower in all antibiotic-treated groups [F(4, 28) = 20.896, P < 0.001; Fig. 6d]. Serum leptin levels were lower in the Ab-L and Ab-H than the control and Ab groups [F(4, 24) = 4.477, P = 0.008; Fig. 6e]. Serum ghrelin levels were lower in all antibiotic-treated groups than in the control gerbils [F(4, 28) = 14.780, P < 0.001; Fig. 6f].

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Energy intake and serum hormones in antibiotic-treated gerbils at different Ta values. (a) Digestible energy intake (DEI). (b) Digestibility. (c to f) Serum T3, T4, leptin, and ghrelin levels. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences among groups (P < 0.05).

TABLE S6

Effect of antibiotic treatment on digestible energy intake (DEI), diet digestibility, and concentrations of serum T3, T4, leptin, and ghrelin. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences among groups (P < 0.05). Control, maintained at 23°C without any treatment. Ab, received antibiotics at 23°C; Ab-H, received antibiotics and were acclimated to 37°C; Ab-L, received antibiotics and were acclimated to 5°C; Ab-LProp, received antibiotics and propionate and were acclimated to 5°C. Download Table S6, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Khakisahneh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Antibiotic treatment led to reductions both in the diversity (see Fig. S3a and b and Table S7 in the supplemental material) and relative abundance (Fig. S3c to e) of gut microbial communities. At the phylum level, the proportions of Firmicutes taxa decreased from 34% in the control group to 4% to 14% in all antibiotic recipients acclimated to different Ta, but Proteobacteria taxa increased from only 7% in the control to 65% to 90% in the antibiotic-treated groups (Fig. S3c and d). At the genus level, the relative abundances of Lactobacillus [F(4, 26) = 13.943, P < 0.001] and Oscillospira [F(4, 26) = 31.718, P < 0.001] reduced after antibiotic treatment (Fig. S3e). Furthermore, at the species level, the relative abundances of Bifidobacterium adolescentis in Ab-H and Morganella morganii in Ab-L increased after antibiotic treatment and different Ta value (P < 0.01, Fig. S3e).

FIG S3

The dynamic diversity and structure of gut microbial community in antibiotic-treated gerbils during different ambient temperature (Ta) acclimations. (a) The α-diversity analysis indicated by Shannon index and observed operational taxonomic units (OTUs) for the samples. (b) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots of Bray-Curtis distance matrix in each sample. (c) Relative abundance of different bacteria at the phylum level in fecal microbial community. (d) Fraction of phylum. (e) Relative abundance of different bacteria at genus and species levels. Bifidobacterium adolescentis, B. adolescentis; M. morganii, Morganella morganii. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 0.8 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Khakisahneh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S7

Alpha diversity, including Chao1, observed OTUs, Shannon index, and PD whole tree, in antibiotic-treated gerbils during different Ta acclimations. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences among groups (P < 0.05). Control, maintained at 23°C without any treatment. Ab, received antibiotics and at 23°C; Ab-H, received antibiotics and were acclimated to 37°C; Ab-L, received antibiotics and were acclimated to 5°C; Ab-LProp, received antibiotics and propionate and were acclimated to 5°C. Download Table S7, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Khakisahneh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DISCUSSION

The annual cycle in thermal physiology of a small mammal is affected by photoperiod, Ta, and food availability (6, 26). In the present study, we observed that the plasticity of host thermoregulation was associated with dynamic changes in gut microbial profiles in response to repeated high or low Ta. Furthermore, we illustrated that gut microbiota depletion could inhibit metabolic plasticity and affect survival in cold-exposed gerbils.

Seasonal variations in thermal physiology can maintain stable body temperature and ensure survival of small mammals living in the temperate and Arctic regions. Most previous studies used a single manipulation or one period of acclimation to test the phenotypic plasticity of small mammals in response to changes in environmental cues (4, 5, 27). However, phenotypic plasticity may include many other factors besides environmental cues per se, including stress, and also, with only one period of acclimation it is difficult to determine whether the acclimation is beneficial or not. In this study, we established an intermittent Ta-acclimated model and found that the gerbils exhibited increases in food intake, RMR, and the T3/T4 ratio under low Ta and exhibited decreases in these variables under high Ta. Small mammals increased food intake for the high energy expenditure in the cold and kept body mass relatively stable (4, 5). The positive correlations between thyroid hormones and RMR or food intake during repeated cold or hot acclimations supported the involvement of thyroid hormones in thermoregulation in small mammals. In contrast, the gerbils reduced food intake and RMR, but still had a higher Tb during hot acclimation. The gerbils decreased food intake by 53% in the first acclimation at 37°C but by 38% in the last acclimation, suggesting that acclimation experience is beneficial to the animals to tolerate extreme heat. These phenotypic data suggest that repeated acclimations induced beneficial consequences for small mammals, especially for thermal tolerance to extreme high Ta.

Microbial diversity is the result of coevolution between the microbial communities and their hosts and is shaped by both genetic and environmental factors (28). In wild mammals, studies have shown that gut microbial diversity varies with seasons, photoperiod, temperature, food, altitude, geography, and social interaction (15, 20, 29). The α-diversity of the microbial community increased at a low Ta and decreased at a high Ta during the last period of acclimation. The increase in the Chao1 index of the control group at week 8 was unexpected, which may be affected by some contamination during sample collection. The β-diversity showed variations, with both high and low Ta during the first and second acclimations but not during the third cold acclimation. Similar patterns were also observed in the relative abundances of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Blautia, and Oscillospira. Additionally, the relative abundances of Butyricimonas and Ruminococcus spp. always increased with intermittent high Ta, indicating that microbes from these genera may be more sensitive to hot condition. These genera are involved in important metabolic functions in hosts and can also affect immunity maintenance and anti-inflammatory properties (30). During low-Ta acclimation, the bacterial diversity increased. The changes in bacteria may contribute to regulating a distinct set of hormones, such as peptide YY and glucagon-like peptide 1 from the gut and adiponectin secretion from adipocytes, to control food intake and support the high energy demands of the host (31, 32). After repeated cold acclimations, the bacterial β-diversity overlapped with that of the control group, and all genera except for Roseburia showed no obvious changes in low-Ta-induced gerbils, suggesting that the gerbils and their gut microbiota have evolved to be more adaptive to low Ta.

The dynamic variations in gut microbiota occurred in parallel with periodic variations in food intake, RMR, thyroid hormones, and SCFAs (especially propionic acid). Diet (amount and macronutrient composition) is one of the major drivers of microbiota abundance and taxonomic composition (33). Therefore, the increase in food intake during cold acclimation may be one reason leading to changes in gut microbiota. However, our previous study, via a paired-feeding protocol (the amount of food intake in cold-acclimated animals was restricted to the same level as that of the control in the warm condition), concluded that low temperature per se led to microbiota differences, which were not due to overfeeding at a low Ta (21). The Tb of gerbils increased by 1.3°C when acclimated repeatedly to high Ta, and decreased by 0.7°C when acclimated repeatedly to low Ta. The previous study also showed that Brandt’s voles reduced Tb by 1°C in response to low-Ta acclimation (20). It indicated that small mammals would adjust their Tb to a new set point to adapt to the low or high Ta. Factors such as temperature and pH may shape gut microbial community by mediating microbe-microbe interactions (34, 35). Consequently, blooms of specific bacteria may modulate host metabolic rate and thus affect Tb.

The role of gut microbiota in contributing to host metabolic and thermal plasticity was further confirmed in antibiotic-treated gerbils. There are no germfree wild animals, so we used composite antibiotics to deplete gut microbiota. The microbial data showed that bacterial α-diversity indicated by the Shannon index was 58% lower in antibiotic-treated gerbils than that their control counterparts. Depletion of gut microbiota led to a reduced metabolic plasticity of the host, with reductions in RMR and NST. The gerbils with depleted microbiota could only maintain a lower Tb (34.2°C versus 36.8°C) at room temperature and, when they were exposed to 5°C, could not survive due to continuous drops in Tb. The inability to regulate thermogenesis in the gerbils without a sufficient gut microbial community may be related to reduced digestibility and less energy acquisition from bacterial fermentation. This possibility was supported by the evidence that supplementation of propionate to antibiotic-treated gerbils led to increases in the regulatory NST, and the propionate recipients could keep a stable Tb and thus survive at 5°C. In support of our result, other studies in mice indicated that gut microbiota and their metabolites contribute to regulating thermogenesis under cold conditions (19, 36). The mechanism underlying the interactions between microbes and metabolism should be further examined.

For the first time, our study illustrated the role of gut microbiota in controlling host phenotypic plasticity in the face of fluctuating Ta. Both the hosts and their symbiotic microbiota were more adaptive to high or low Ta after repeated exposures. Using antibiotic-treated gerbils, we demonstrated the reduced function of the gut microbial community and reduced digestibility and thermogenesis of the host. These gerbils could not survive at a low Ta. The situation could be reversed by supplement of propionate as an energy resource. The intermittent-Ta acclimation model not only mimics seasonal environments but also provides an effective approach to promote individual tolerance to extreme Ta and population fitness in fluctuating environments. Further studies are needed to determine how the endogenous gut microbiota perceive the thermal environment and alter the community to benefit both sides of the holobiont in endothermic mammals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental animals.Mongolian gerbils were housed with same-sex siblings in plastic cages (30 × 15 × 20 cm) with sawdust bedding. Every 3 years, the breeding colonies were rejuvenated with wild gerbils from the desert grasslands of Inner Mongolia or with gerbils from other laboratories. All gerbils were maintained at 23°C ± 1°C on a 16:8 light-dark cycle and were offered commercial standard rat pellets (Beijing KeAo Bioscience Co.) and water ad libitum. All animals were habituated in individual cages at least 2 weeks before experiments. All procedures in the study were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Experimental designs.Experiment 1 tested the effects of intermittent temperature on metabolic rate and gut microbial community. Thirty Mongolian gerbils (between 6 months and 1 year of age) were divided randomly into 3 groups (n = 10 per group). In the first 2 weeks, the gerbils were kept at 23°C ± 1°C, then transferred to a high Ta (37°C ± 1°C, HC group) or a low Ta (5°C ± 1°C, LC group) for another 2 weeks, then returned to 23°C ± 1°C; this was done 3 times. Another group was used as a control group (C) and was maintained at 23°C ± 1°C for 12 weeks. The 2-week intervals were chosen based on a previous study by Zhang and Wang (5), which showed that the animals can be acclimated to a new Ta in 2 weeks with stable food intake and thermogenic responses. Body mass (± 0.1 g) and food consumption were measured every 3 days during the course of the experiment. RMR was measured at every 2-week interval. At the end of every 2-week interval, blood was collected from the infraorbital vein for the measurement of thyroid hormones. Fresh feces were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for the measurement of SCFAs and for DNA extraction.

Experiment 2 examined the role of gut microbiota in host response to thermal fluctuation. Another 50 gerbils were divided into 5 groups (n = 10 per group). A control group (with daily gavage of 200 μl deionized water) was maintained at 23°C ± 1°C during the experimental period. The other 4 groups were all administered an antibiotic cocktail (100 mg/ml neomycin, 50 mg/ml streptomycin, 50 mg/ml vancomycin, 100 mg/ml metronidazole, 1 mg/ml bacitracin, 170 mg/ml gentamicin, and 1 mg/ml ampicillin) in 200 μl via intragastric gavage once a day during the whole experiment (19, 37). These antibiotic-treated gerbils were first kept at 23°C ± 1°C for 6 days and then either at 23°C ± 1°C (Ab), or at a high Ta (37°C ± 1°C, Ab-H), at a low Ta (5°C ± 1°C, Ab-L), and at a low Ta together with a daily gavage of propionate at a dose of 250 mg/kg body mass (Ab-LProp) (38). We gavaged the gerbils with propionate based on the changes in SCFAs during intermittent Ta acclimation in experiment 1. Body mass, food intake, and Tb were monitored every 3 days. RMR and NST were measured in the third week of Ta acclimation, and blood was collected from the infraorbital vein for later measurement of serum hormones.

Core body temperature.The core body temperature (Tb) of the gerbils was recorded using a Thermochron iButton (catalog no. DS1922L-F5, with a precision of 0.0625°C) (20). Animals were anesthetized via an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (1%) with a dose of 50 mg/kg. The iButton, coated with a thin layer of silicon (Elastostil E41; Wacker) for water protection, was implanted in the abdomen of each gerbil and was programmed to store Tb every 60 min beginning 1 week after implantation. At the end of experiment, the iButton was removed, and all records were read using OneWireViewer Software.

Metabolic trials.A multichannel open flow respirometer (TSE LabMaster, Germany) was used for RMR measurement as described previously (20, 39, 40). Briefly, 0.9 liters/min were pumped through the chamber, which was set at 30°C ± 0.5°C (within the TNZ of Mongolian gerbils). The respirometry system was run for 3 h, and RMR was calculated as an average of 3 consecutive and minimum readings of oxygen consumption after 1 h. RMR data from the 2nd to 4th weeks was missed due to the machine’s malfunction.

We injected norepinephrine (NE; Shanghai Harvest Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) into each gerbil to induce the NSTmax (4). The dosage of NE was calculated according to the following equation: NE (mg/kg) = 6.6 × Mb−0.458, where Mb is the body mass in grams (41, 42). During a 1-h measurement, gerbils were housed individually in the metabolic chamber with a volume of 2.7 liters (type I for mice) at 25 ± 1°C. The 3 highest consecutive readings of oxygen consumption after 15 to 20 min were averaged to calculate the NSTmax. The regulatory NST (NSTreg), which is produced from brown adipose tissue (BAT), was calculated by NSTmax minus RMR (43).

Energy intake and digestibility.Food intake was determined by weighing the food offered and the food remains over 3 days. From days 15 to 18, the uneaten food and feces together with the bedding material were collected and then oven-dried at 60°C for at least 72 h. Food and feces were separated manually, then weighed, and the energy content of food and feces were measured using an oxygen bomb calorimeter (IKA C2000; Germany). The bomb calorimeter was calibrated by burning benzoic acid. Gross energy intake (GEI), digestible energy intake (DEI), and digestibility were calculated using the following equations:

GEI (kJ/day) = dry food intake (g/day) × food energy content (kJ/g dry matter)

fecal energy (kJ/day) = dry feces (g/day) × fecal energy content (kJ/g dry matter)

DEI (kJ/day) = GEI (kJ/day) − fecal energy (kJ/day)

digestibility (%) = DEI (kJ/day)/GEI (kJ/day) × 100%

Serum hormone assays.The 125I radioimmunoassay (RIA) kits of T3 and T4 (Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China) that were previously validated for Mongolian gerbil were used to quantify serum T3 and T4 concentrations. The intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) were 5.1% for T3 and 4.4% for T4 (44).

Serum ghrelin levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (catalog no. CEA991Ra; Cloud-Clone Corp.), and serum leptin levels were measured using an ELISA kit for leptin (catalog no. SEA084Ra; Cloud-Clone Corp.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm against a blank using an ELISA reader (RayBiotech, Canada). The intra- and interassay CVs were <10% and <15% for both kits. The minimum detectable dose for ghrelin was 52.3 pg/ml, and that for leptin was 0.129 ng/ml.

SCFAs.Six main SCFAs were measured by gas chromatography (GC) (Agilent7890A; Agilent Technologies, Germany) according to protocols that were described before (20, 45). For extraction, fecal sample (0.2 g) was mixed with double-distilled water (ddH2O) and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm at 4°C for 20 min. The supernatant was added to H3PO4 (25%) at a ratio of 9:1, filtered (0.22 μm), and then SCFAs were separated in a 30 m× 0.25 mm× 0.25 μm DB-WAX column (polyethylene glycol 20000; Agilent Technologies) for separation of SCFAs. The system was operated at a maximum temperature of 250°C with helium (>99.999%) as a carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 ml/min. Splitless injection of 0.5 μl of sample was done at 230°C. The temperature was programmed at 60°C for 1 min, increased at a rate of 5°C/min to 200°C, and then at 10°C/min to 230°C. For each sample, the total running time lasted 32 min. The SCFAs were identified by comparing their retention times with those of authentic reference compounds and quantified by the abundance relative to that of the standard.

DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.Total DNA was extracted from feces (180 to 220 mg) by 2× cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and phenol-chloroform mixture (phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol, 25:24:1) and via the spin column (from the SanPrep column DNA gel extraction kit; Sangon Biotech, China) with the same method outlined by Zhang and colleagues (20). A NanoDrop ND-2000 UV spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA) was used to check DNA concentration and DNA quality (A260/A280). DNAs with an A260/A280 ratio of 1.8 to 2.0 were used for PCR amplification. For sequencing DNA from fecal samples, the 2-step PCR was run with two proposed universal primers of V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA gene, forward primer-341F (TTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT XXXXXX CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG) and reverse primer-805R (TTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT XXXXXX GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC) (the first segment refers to Illumina core sequence, XXXXXX refers to barcode, and a single underline refers to V3-V4 universal primer sequences). A 20-μl PCR mixture was as follows: 2 μl template DNA, 1 μl amplicon PCR forward primer (10 μM), 1 μl amplicon PCR reverse primer (10 μM), and 16 μl 2× Taq PCR mastermix. PCR was run with the program following: 1 cycle of denaturing at 94°C for 3 min, 6 cycles of denaturing at 94°C for 20 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and elongation at 72°C for 30 s, then followed by 30 cycles of denaturing at 94°C for 15 s, annealing at 68°C for 15 s, elongation at 72°C for 20 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were purified by kit (GE0101-200; TsingKe Biological Technology, China), and then sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (46).

The paired-end sequence data were joined and the quality was filtered using the FLASH method (47). All sequence analysis was done using QIIME (v1.9.1) according to the tutorial (http://qiime.org/) with some modifications (48). usearch61 with de novo models was used to remove chimeric sequences (49). Sequences were clustered against the 2013 Greengenes (13_8 release) ribosomal database’s 97% reference data set. The sequences that did not match any entries in this reference database were clustered with UCLUST into de novo operation taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% similarity. Taxonomy was assigned to all OTUs using the RDP classifier within QIIME and the Greengenes reference data set (50). Rarefaction and rank abundance curves were calculated from OTU tables using α-diversity and rank abundance scripts within the QIIME pipeline. The hierarchical clustering based on population profiles of the most common and abundant taxa was performed using unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) clustering (also known as average linkage) on the distance matrix of OTU abundance. This resulted in a Newick-formatted tree, which was obtained utilizing the QIIME package.

Statistical analysis.During the course of intermittent acclimation to 5°C, 37°C, and 23°C conditions, data for body mass and Tb were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), and food intake was analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with body mass as a covariate. Data for RMR and propionic acid on any time points of intermittent acclimation were examined by one-way ANCOVA or ANOVA, followed by least-significant difference (LSD) post hoc tests when the main effects were significant. In experiments 2, DEI, digestibility, serum T3 and T4, leptin, and ghrelin were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by LSD post hoc tests. For statistical analysis, we used SPSS Statistics 17.0 for windows (Chicago, IL). Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), and P < 0.05 was considered statistical difference.

For appraisal of richness and diversity of bacteria, α-diversity was calculated by Chao1, observed OTUs, Shannon index, and PD whole-tree analysis (20, 51). Significant group differences in bacterial relative abundances were examined by one-way ANOVA. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA; β-diversity) based on Bray-Curtis distance between the samples was made for the 3 groups during the 3 acclimation periods (weeks 4, 8, and 12) (46, 52, 53), and the significance for PCoA was tested with multivariate permutation tests using the nonparametric method ANOSIM (52). The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) method was performed by the computational tool, using the Kruskal-Wallis (KW) rank sum test on classes, the pairwise Wilcoxon test between subclasses of different classes, and the LDA on the relevant features, to identify the differential biomarkers (54). Bootstrapping (“-permutations 1000”) and Pearson correlation were used to calculate the correlation between OTUs and physiological parameters. The level of statistical significance was set at a P value of <0.05 (false-discovery rate-corrected P value). The graphics and statistics were developed in Excel and STAMP v2.1.3. (http://kiwi.cs.dal.ca/Software/STAMP).

Data availability.Raw sequence data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession number PRJNA662422.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We appreciate the constructive comments and suggestions by the anonymous reviewers. We thank all members of Animal Physiological Ecology Group for their suggestions. We are grateful to Zhijun Zhao and his student Menghuan Bao in College of Life and Environmental Science in Wenzhou University for the measurement of fecal energy content. We also thank Jianfeng Wang and Bin Chen from Beijing Nebula Medical Laboratory Co., Ltd., for help in 16S rRNA gene sequencing and analyses.

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 31770440 and 31772461) and by the Fourth Pilot-Research Program for Human Spaceflight (grant number 020103). S.K. was supported by UCAS Scholarship program for international students.

We declare no conflict of interest.

X.-Y.Z. and D.-H.W. conceived the study and design the experiments. S.K. and X.-Y.Z. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. Z.N. measured serum hormones. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received June 10, 2020.
    • Accepted September 30, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 Khakisahneh et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Leroi AM,
    2. Bennett AF,
    3. Lenski RE
    . 1994. Temperature acclimation and competitive fitness: an experimental test of the beneficial acclimation assumption. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:1917–1921. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.5.1917.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Westneat DF,
    2. Potts LJ,
    3. Sasser KL,
    4. Shaffer JD
    . 2019. Causes and consequences of phenotypic plasticity in complex environments. Trends Ecol Evol 34:555–568. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2019.02.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. McNab BK
    . 2002. The physiological ecology of vertebrates: a view from energetics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Li X-S,
    2. Wang D-H
    . 2005. Seasonal adjustments in body mass and thermogenesis in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus): the roles of short photoperiod and cold. J Comp Physiol B 175:593–600. doi:10.1007/s00360-005-0022-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Zhang X-Y,
    2. Wang D-H
    . 2006. Energy metabolism, thermogenesis and body mass regulation in Brandt’s voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii) during cold acclimation and rewarming. Horm Behav 50:61–69. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.01.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Concannon P,
    2. Levac K,
    3. Rawson R,
    4. Tennant B,
    5. Bensadoun A
    . 2001. Seasonal changes in serum leptin, food intake, and body weight in photoentrained woodchucks. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281:R951–R959. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.2001.281.3.R951.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Carey HV,
    2. Walters WA,
    3. Knight R
    . 2013. Seasonal restructuring of the ground squirrel gut microbiota over the annual hibernation cycle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 304:R33–R42. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00387.2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Friedman JM,
    2. Halaas JL
    . 1998. Leptin and the regulation of body weight in mammals. Nature 395:763–770. doi:10.1038/27376.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mullur R,
    2. Liu Y-Y,
    3. Brent GA
    . 2014. Thyroid hormone regulation of metabolism. Physiol Rev 94:355–382. doi:10.1152/physrev.00030.2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lyte M
    . 2014. Microbial endocrinology: host-microbiota neuroendocrine interactions influencing brain and behavior. Gut Microbes 5:381–389. doi:10.4161/gmic.28682.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Turnbaugh PJ,
    2. Ley RE,
    3. Mahowald MA,
    4. Magrini V,
    5. Mardis ER,
    6. Gordon JI
    . 2006. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444:1027–1031. doi:10.1038/nature05414.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. McFall-Ngai M,
    2. Hadfield MG,
    3. Bosch TCG,
    4. Carey HV,
    5. Domazet-Lošo T,
    6. Douglas AE,
    7. Dubilier N,
    8. Eberl G,
    9. Fukami T,
    10. Gilbert SF,
    11. Hentschel U,
    12. King N,
    13. Kjelleberg S,
    14. Knoll AH,
    15. Kremer N,
    16. Mazmanian SK,
    17. Metcalf JL,
    18. Nealson K,
    19. Pierce NE,
    20. Rawls JF,
    21. Reid A,
    22. Ruby EG,
    23. Rumpho M,
    24. Sanders JG,
    25. Tautz D,
    26. Wernegreen JJ
    . 2013. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:3229–3236. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218525110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Benítez-Páez A,
    2. del Pugar EMG,
    3. López-Almela I,
    4. Moya-Pérez Á,
    5. Codoñer-Franch P,
    6. Sanz Y
    . 2020. Depletion of Blautia species in the microbiota of obese children relates to intestinal inflammation and metabolic phenotype worsening. mSystems 5:e00857-19. doi:10.1128/mSystems.00857-19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Cani PD,
    2. Van Hul M,
    3. Lefort C,
    4. Depommier C,
    5. Rastelli M,
    6. Everard A
    . 2019. Microbial regulation of organismal energy homeostasis. Nat Metab 1:34–46. doi:10.1038/s42255-018-0017-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Maurice CF,
    2. Knowles SCL,
    3. Ladau J,
    4. Pollard KS,
    5. Fenton A,
    6. Pedersen AB,
    7. Turnbaugh PJ
    . 2015. Marked seasonal variation in the wild mouse gut microbiota. ISME J 9:2423–2434. doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Stevenson TJ,
    2. Duddleston KN,
    3. Buck CL
    . 2014. Effects of season and host physiological state on the diversity, density, and activity of the arctic ground squirrel cecal microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:5611–5622. doi:10.1128/AEM.01537-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kohl KD,
    2. Yahn J
    . 2016. Effects of environmental temperature on the gut microbial communities of tadpoles. Environ Microbiol 18:1561–1565. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13255.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Bestion E,
    2. Jacob S,
    3. Zinger L,
    4. Di Gesu L,
    5. Richard M,
    6. White J,
    7. Cote J
    . 2017. Climate warming reduces gut microbiota diversity in a vertebrate ectotherm. Nat Ecol Evol 1:e0161. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0161.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Chevalier C,
    2. Stojanović O,
    3. Colin Didier J,
    4. Suarez-Zamorano N,
    5. Tarallo V,
    6. Veyrat-Durebex C,
    7. Rigo D,
    8. Fabbiano S,
    9. Stevanović A,
    10. Hagemann S,
    11. Montet X,
    12. Seimbille Y,
    13. Zamboni N,
    14. Hapfelmeier S,
    15. Trajkovski M
    . 2015. Gut microbiota orchestrates energy homeostasis during cold. Cell 163:1360–1374. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Zhang X-Y,
    2. Sukhchuluun G,
    3. Bo T-B,
    4. Chi Q-S,
    5. Yang J-J,
    6. Chen B,
    7. Zhang L,
    8. Wang D-H
    . 2018. Huddling remodels gut microbiota to reduce energy requirements in a small mammal species during cold exposure. Microbiome 6:103. doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0473-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bo T-B,
    2. Zhang X-Y,
    3. Wen J,
    4. Deng K,
    5. Qin X-W,
    6. Wang D-H
    . 2019. The microbiota-gut-brain interaction in regulating host metabolic adaptation to cold in male Brandt’s voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii). ISME J 13:3037–3053. doi:10.1038/s41396-019-0492-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wang D,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Wang Z
    . 2000. Metabolism and thermoregulation in the Mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus. Acta Theriol 45:183–192. doi:10.4098/AT.arch.00-21.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Zhang Z-Q,
    2. Wang D-H
    . 2007. Seasonal changes in thermogenesis and body mass in wild Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 148:346–353. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.05.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Liu W,
    2. Wan X,
    3. Zhong W
    . 2007. Population dynamics of the Mongolian gerbils: seasonal patterns and interactions among density, reproduction and climate. J Arid Environments 68:383–397. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.07.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Yao W,
    2. Liu W,
    3. Deng K,
    4. Wang Z,
    5. Wang D-H,
    6. Zhang X-Y
    . 2019. GnRH expression and cell proliferation are associated with seasonal breeding and food hoarding in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Horm Behav 112:42–53. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.03.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Evans AL,
    2. Singh NJ,
    3. Friebe A,
    4. Arnemo JM,
    5. Laske TG,
    6. Fröbert O,
    7. Swenson JE,
    8. Blanc S
    . 2016. Drivers of hibernation in the brown bear. Front Zool 13:7. doi:10.1186/s12983-016-0140-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Zhao Z-J,
    2. Chi Q-S,
    3. Cao J,
    4. Wang D-H
    . 2014. Seasonal changes of body mass and energy budget in striped hamsters: the role of leptin. Physiol Biochem Zool 87:245–256. doi:10.1086/674974.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Ley RE,
    2. Hamady M,
    3. Lozupone C,
    4. Turnbaugh PJ,
    5. Ramey RR,
    6. Bircher JS,
    7. Schlegel ML,
    8. Tucker TA,
    9. Schrenzel MD,
    10. Knight R,
    11. Gordon JI
    . 2008. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 320:1647–1651. doi:10.1126/science.1155725.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Zhu L,
    2. Wu Q,
    3. Dai J,
    4. Zhang S,
    5. Wei F
    . 2011. Evidence of cellulose metabolism by the giant panda gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:17714–17719. doi:10.1073/pnas.1017956108.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Gophna U,
    2. Konikoff T,
    3. Nielsen HB
    . 2017. Oscillospira and related bacteria—from metagenomic species to metabolic features. Environ Microbiol 19:835–841. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13658.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Psichas A,
    2. Sleeth M,
    3. Murphy K,
    4. Brooks L,
    5. Bewick G,
    6. Hanyaloglu A,
    7. Ghatei M,
    8. Bloom S,
    9. Frost G
    . 2015. The short chain fatty acid propionate stimulates GLP-1 and PYY secretion via free fatty acid receptor 2 in rodents. Int J Obes (Lond) 39:424–429. doi:10.1038/ijo.2014.153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hong J,
    2. Jia Y,
    3. Pan S,
    4. Jia L,
    5. Li H,
    6. Han Z,
    7. Cai D,
    8. Zhao R
    . 2016. Butyrate alleviates high fat diet-induced obesity through activation of adiponectin-mediated pathway and stimulation of mitochondrial function in the skeletal muscle of mice. Oncotarget 7:56071–56082. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.11267.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Faith JJ,
    2. McNulty NP,
    3. Rey FE,
    4. Gordon JI
    . 2011. Predicting a human gut microbiota’s response to diet in gnotobiotic mice. Science 333:101–104. doi:10.1126/science.1206025.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Coyte K,
    2. Schluter J,
    3. Foster K
    . 2015. The ecology of the microbiome: networks, competition, and stability. Science 350:663–666. doi:10.1126/science.aad2602.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Aranda-Díaz A,
    2. Obadia B,
    3. Dodge R,
    4. Thomsen T,
    5. Hallberg ZF,
    6. Güvener ZT,
    7. Ludington WB,
    8. Huang KC
    . 2020. Bacterial interspecies interactions modulate pH-mediated antibiotic tolerance. Elife 9:e51493. doi:10.7554/eLife.51493.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Li B,
    2. Li L,
    3. Li M,
    4. Lam SM,
    5. Wang G,
    6. Wu Y,
    7. Zhang H,
    8. Niu C,
    9. Zhang X,
    10. Liu X,
    11. Hambly C,
    12. Jin W,
    13. Shui G,
    14. Speakman JR
    . 2019. Microbiota depletion impairs thermogenesis of brown adipose tissue and browning of white adipose tissue. Cell Rep 26:2720–2737.e5. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.015.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    1. Grivennikov SI,
    2. Wang K,
    3. Mucida D,
    4. Stewart CA,
    5. Schnabl B,
    6. Jauch D,
    7. Taniguchi K,
    8. Yu G-Y,
    9. Osterreicher CH,
    10. Hung KE,
    11. Datz C,
    12. Feng Y,
    13. Fearon ER,
    14. Oukka M,
    15. Tessarollo L,
    16. Coppola V,
    17. Yarovinsky F,
    18. Cheroutre H,
    19. Eckmann L,
    20. Trinchieri G,
    21. Karin M
    . 2012. Adenoma-linked barrier defects and microbial products drive IL-23/IL-17-mediated tumour growth. Nature 491:254–258. doi:10.1038/nature11465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Al-Daihan S,
    2. Shafi Bhat R
    . 2015. Impact of propionic acid on liver damage in rats. Int J Mol Cell Med 4:188–195.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    1. Chi Q-S,
    2. Li X-J,
    3. Wang D-H
    . 2018. 2-Deoxy-d-glucose, not mercaptoacetate, induces a reversible reduction of body temperature in male desert hamsters (Phodopus roborovskii). J Therm Biol 71:189–194. doi:10.1016/j.jtherbio.2017.11.011.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Pan Q,
    2. Li M,
    3. Shi Y-L,
    4. Liu H,
    5. Speakman JR,
    6. Wang D-H
    . 2014. Lipidomics reveals mitochondrial membrane remodeling associated with acute thermoregulation in a rodent with a wide thermoneutral zone. Lipids 49:715–730. doi:10.1007/s11745-014-3900-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Heldmaier G
    . 1971. Nonshivering thermogenesis and body size in mammals. Z Vergl Physiol 73:222–248. doi:10.1007/BF00304134.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Wang D
    . 2006. Comparison of nonshivering thermogenesis induced by dosages of norepinephrine from 3 allometric equations in Brandt’s voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii). Acta Theriol Sin 26:84–88.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Guo Y-Y,
    2. Chi Q-S,
    3. Zhang X-Y,
    4. Liu W,
    5. Hao S-Y,
    6. Wang D-H
    . 2019. Brown adipose tissue plays thermoregulatory role within the thermoneutral zone in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). J Therm Biol 81:137–145. doi:10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.02.015.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. 44.↵
    1. Khakisahneh S,
    2. Zhang X-Y,
    3. Nouri Z,
    4. Hao S-Y,
    5. Chi Q-S,
    6. Wang D-H
    . 2019. Thyroid hormones mediate metabolic rate and oxidative, anti-oxidative balance at different temperatures in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 216:101–109. doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2018.11.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    1. Rasmussen KE,
    2. Pedersen-Bjergaard S,
    3. Krogh M,
    4. Ugland HG,
    5. Grønhaug T
    . 2000. Development of a simple in-vial liquid-phase microextraction device for drug analysis compatible with capillary gas chromatography, capillary electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 873:3–11. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(99)01163-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. 46.↵
    1. de Muinck EJ,
    2. Trosvik P,
    3. Gilfillan GD,
    4. Hov JR,
    5. Sundaram AYM
    . 2017. A novel ultra high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing library preparation method for the Illumina HiSeq platform. Microbiome 5:68. doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0279-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. 47.↵
    1. Magoč T,
    2. Salzberg SL
    . 2011. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27:2957–2963. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Caporaso JG,
    2. Kuczynski J,
    3. Stombaugh J,
    4. Bittinger K,
    5. Bushman FD,
    6. Costello EK,
    7. Fierer N,
    8. Peña AG,
    9. Goodrich JK,
    10. Gordon JI,
    11. Huttley GA,
    12. Kelley ST,
    13. Knights D,
    14. Koenig JE,
    15. Ley RE,
    16. Lozupone CA,
    17. McDonald D,
    18. Muegge BD,
    19. Pirrung M,
    20. Reeder J,
    21. Sevinsky JR,
    22. Turnbaugh PJ,
    23. Walters WA,
    24. Widmann J,
    25. Yatsunenko T,
    26. Zaneveld J,
    27. Knight R
    . 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336. doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Edgar RC
    . 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Cole JR,
    2. Wang Q,
    3. Cardenas E,
    4. Fish J,
    5. Chai B,
    6. Farris RJ,
    7. Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS,
    8. McGarrell DM,
    9. Marsh T,
    10. Garrity GM,
    11. Tiedje JM
    . 2009. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D141–D145. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn879.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Shannon CE
    . 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. 52.↵
    1. Paliy O,
    2. Shankar V
    . 2016. Application of multivariate statistical techniques in microbial ecology. Mol Ecol 25:1032–1057. doi:10.1111/mec.13536.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. 53.↵
    1. Minich JJ,
    2. Zhu Q,
    3. Janssen S,
    4. Hendrickson R,
    5. Amir A,
    6. Vetter R,
    7. Hyde J,
    8. Doty MM,
    9. Stillwell K,
    10. Benardini J,
    11. Kim JH,
    12. Allen EE,
    13. Venkateswaran K,
    14. Knight R
    . 2018. KatharoSeq enables high-throughput microbiome analysis from low-biomass samples. mSystems 3. doi:10.1128/mSystems.00218-17.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. 54.↵
    1. Segata N,
    2. Izard J,
    3. Waldron L,
    4. Gevers D,
    5. Miropolsky L,
    6. Garrett WS,
    7. Huttenhower C
    . 2011. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 12:R60–18. doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Gut Microbiota and Host Thermoregulation in Response to Ambient Temperature Fluctuations
Saeid Khakisahneh, Xue-Ying Zhang, Zahra Nouri, De-Hua Wang
mSystems Oct 2020, 5 (5) e00514-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00514-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSystems article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gut Microbiota and Host Thermoregulation in Response to Ambient Temperature Fluctuations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSystems
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSystems.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Gut Microbiota and Host Thermoregulation in Response to Ambient Temperature Fluctuations
Saeid Khakisahneh, Xue-Ying Zhang, Zahra Nouri, De-Hua Wang
mSystems Oct 2020, 5 (5) e00514-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00514-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

food intake
gut microbiome
intermittent temperature
resting metabolic rate
thyroid hormones

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSystems
  • Author Videos
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • Overleaf Pilot
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSystemsJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5077