Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Editor's Picks
    • Special Series: Sponsored Minireviews and Video Abstracts
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Novel Systems Biology Techniques
    • Early-Career Systems Microbiology Perspectives
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About mSystems
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSystems
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Editor's Picks
    • Special Series: Sponsored Minireviews and Video Abstracts
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Novel Systems Biology Techniques
    • Early-Career Systems Microbiology Perspectives
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About mSystems
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Novel Systems Biology Techniques

Metabolic Feedback Inhibition Influences Metabolite Secretion by the Human Gut Symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron

Jennie L. Catlett, Jonathan Catazaro, Mikaela Cashman, Sean Carr, Robert Powers, Myra B. Cohen, Nicole R. Buan
Rup Lal, Editor
Jennie L. Catlett
aDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Catazaro
bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mikaela Cashman
cDepartment of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
dOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean Carr
aDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Powers
bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
eNebraska Center for Integrated Biomolecular Communication, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Myra B. Cohen
cDepartment of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicole R. Buan
aDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
eNebraska Center for Integrated Biomolecular Communication, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicole R. Buan
Rup Lal
University of Delhi
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00252-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Metabolites secreted by B. theta. Concentrations of secreted metabolites detected after batch growth in defined minimal glucose medium (mean of 5 biological and 5 technical replicates, n = 25).

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Secretion fluxes of organic acids and amino acids in defined minimal medium. Numbers represent percent mole carbon fluxes (not shown, CO2 inferred, 4.6%). Gray outlined circles represent undetected intracellular metabolic nodes. Black outlined circles indicate secreted metabolites. Shading is proportional to concentration in culture medium.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Effect of metabolic feedback inhibition on growth. (a) Population doubling time of cultures on defined minimal medium supplemented with acetate (n = 8 biological replicates, P < 0.01 versus 0 mM, r2 = 0.94). (b) Population doubling time of cultures on defined minimal medium supplemented with formate (n = 5 biological replicates, P < 0.01 versus 0 mM). (c) Final optical densities of cultures with and without supplementation of 10 mM acetate (Ac) and 10 mM formate (Fo) (n = 5 biological replicates, P > 0.05 versus 0 mM). (d) Concentrations of secreted metabolites with increasing acetate supplementation (means from 5 biological and 5 technical replicates, n = 25). P values are shown in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Curves were fit according to parabolic functions (a) or least-squares regression (b and d). Error bars may be obscured by symbols.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Effect of acetate feedback inhibition on secretion fluxes. (a) Concentrations of secreted metabolites with increasing acetate supplementation (means from 5 biological and 5 technical replicates, n = 25). P values are shown in Table S2. Error bars may be obscured by symbols. (b) Change in secretion fluxes with increasing acetate supplementation (means from 5 biological and 5 technical replicates, n = 25). P values are shown in Table S3. (c) Effect of acetate feedback inhibition (10 mM) mapped onto a metabolic network. Red, decreased secretion. Shading is proportional to flux magnitude. Gray outlined circles represent undetected intracellular metabolic nodes. asp, aspartate.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Effect of formate supplementation on acetate feedback inhibition. (a) Change in organic acid secretion with and without supplementation of 10 mM acetate or a combination of 10 mM acetate (Ac) and 10 mM formate (Fo). (b) Change in secreted amino acids with and without supplementation. (c) Effect of 10 mM formate supplementation on 10 mM acetate feedback inhibition mapped to the metabolic network. Green, increased secretion; red, decreased secretion; gray, no significant difference between 10 mM acetate versus 10 mM acetate and 10 mM formate conditions. Shading is proportional to flux magnitude. Gray outlined circles represent undetected intracellular metabolic nodes. asp, aspartate. P values for data in panels a and b are shown in Table S4. Error bars may be too small to see.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Simulation of the effect of feedback inhibition on metabolism. (a) Predicted biomass in high-glucose (HG) and low-glucose (LG) medium as acetate (Ac) and formate (Fo) concentrations were varied from 0 mM to 10 mM. (b) Predicted effect of acetate and/or formate on exchange fluxes in HG medium. (c) Predicted effect of acetate on exchange fluxes in LG medium. (d) Predicted effect of formate on exchange fluxes in LG medium. Green, increased exchange flux; red, decreased exchange flux; gray, no net change in exchange flux due to metabolic rerouting; white, no change predicted.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • TABLE 1

    Effect of formate and acetate on B. theta growth rate in defined medium

    TABLE 1
    • ↵a Ac, acetate; Fo, formate. Data were obtained from six biological replicates (n = 6).

    • ↵b Not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

  • TABLE 2

    pH of stationary-phase cultures in buffered medium

    TABLE 2
    • ↵a Ac, acetate; Fo, formate. Data were obtained from six biological replicates (n = 6).

    • ↵b Not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

  • TABLE 3

    Acetate suppression coefficients of secreted metabolites

    TABLE 3

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • TABLE S1

    Student’s t test P values for metabolomics data in Fig. 3d. P values are given for each metabolite measured in spent medium as acetate is supplemented from 0 to 10 mM. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Catlett et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S1

    NMR metabolomics. (a) PCA scores plot generated from 1D 1H NMR spectra from spent culture medium (red, n = 25) and uninoculated medium (blue, n = 5). Ellipses correspond to the 95% confidence interval for a normal distribution. (b) Back-scaled loadings plot generated from a validated OPLS-discriminant analysis (DA) model (P value < 1 × 10−37) comparing the spent culture medium and uninoculated medium 1D 1H NMR datasets. Positive peaks indicate an increase in spent culture medium and negative peaks indicate a decrease in spent culture medium. Positive peaks labeled and added in as inlets are numbered as follows: 15, formate; 13 and 14, histidine at 7.12 and 7.96 ppm; 12, hematin; 11, glucose; 2 and 10, alanine at 1.48 and 3.83 ppm; 8, cysteine at 3.05, 3.09, and 3.99 ppm; 9, cysteine at 3.20, 3.42, and 4.11 ppm; 7, asparagine at 2.97 ppm; 6, succinate; 5, glutathione at 2.50 ppm; 4, acetate; 3, lactate at 1.33 ppm. Peaks colored red are scaled 4× and colored green are scaled 2× to their actual intensities as depicted in the full-width spectrum in blue. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 1.8 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Catlett et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    Student’s t test P values for metabolomics data in Fig. 4a. P values are given for the change in concentration of each metabolite measured in spent medium as acetate is supplemented from 0 to 10 mM. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Catlett et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S3

    Student’s t test P values for metabolomics data in Fig. 4b. Slope and Pearson correlation coefficient (r2) values are given for the change in concentration of each metabolite measured in spent medium as acetate is supplemented from 0 to 10 mM. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Catlett et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    Theoretical modeling of the effect of acetate supplementation on the observed secreted metabolites. Models assume a fraction of supplemented acetate is converted to secreted metabolite x. xsec=xinit+aAsup+bAsup. (a) Secretion is additive with no destruction and no regulation when a>0 and b=0. x axis, arbitrary time units; y axis, Δxsec, arbitrary change in concentration of metabolite x detected in the culture medium. Colors represent concentrations of supplemented acetate. (b) Secretion fluxes are constant with balanced secretion and absorption when aAsup+bAsup= −xinit. x axis, arbitrary time units; y axis, Δxsec, arbitrary change in concentration of metabolite x detected in the culture medium. Colors represent concentrations of supplemented acetate. Symbols and lines overlap and may not be visible. (c) Feedback inhibition with no regulation when a<0 and b=0. x axis, arbitrary time units; y axis, Δxsec, arbitrary change in concentration of metabolite x detected in the culture medium. Colors represent concentration of supplemented acetate. (d) Synergistic negative feedback inhibition with compensatory gene regulation when a<0 and b<0. x axis, arbitrary time units; y axis, Δxsec, arbitrary change in concentration of metabolite x detected in the culture medium. Colors represent concentrations of supplemented acetate. Symbols and lines overlap and may not be visible. (e) Positive upregulation in response to increasing acetate when a>0 and b>0. x axis, arbitrary time units; y axis, Δxsec, arbitrary change in concentration of metabolite x detected in the culture medium. Colors represent concentrations of supplemented acetate. Symbols and lines overlap and may not be visible. Download FIG S2, EPS file, 1.0 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Catlett et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S4

    Student’s t test P values for metabolomics data in Fig. 5a and b. P values are given for the change in concentration of each metabolite measured in spent medium in the absence and presence of 10 mM acetate and 10 mM formate supplementation. Download Table S4, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Catlett et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • MOVIE S1

    Animated secretion fluxes of organic acids and amino acids in defined minimal medium. Numbers represent percent mole carbon fluxes (not shown, CO2 inferred, 4.6%). Gray outlined circles represent undetected intracellular metabolic nodes. Black outlined circles indicate secreted metabolites. Shading is proportional to concentration in culture medium from 0% (red circles) to yellow (50%) to green (100%) carbon flux. Download Movie S1, GIF file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Catlett et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • MOVIE S2

    Animated effect of acetate feedback inhibition on secretion fluxes. The effect of acetate feedback inhibition (10 mM) mapped onto a metabolic network. Gray outlined circles represent undetected intracellular metabolic nodes. Black outlined circles indicate secreted metabolites. Shading is proportional to change in carbon flux compared to no acetate control from 0% (red circles) to yellow (50%) to green (100%). Download Movie S2, GIF file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Catlett et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • MOVIE S3

    Animated effect of formate supplementation on acetate feedback inhibition. The effect of formate (10 mM) and acetate feedback inhibition (10 mM) mapped onto a metabolic network. Gray outlined circles represent undetected intracellular metabolic nodes. Black outlined circles indicate secreted metabolites. Shading is proportional to concentration in culture medium from 0% (red circles) to yellow (50%) to green (100%) carbon flux. Download Movie S3, GIF file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Catlett et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • DATA SET S1

    Model parameters and output flux data for high-glucose and low-glucose FBA models are included in an Excel spreadsheet. Download Data Set S1, XLSX file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Catlett et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Metabolic Feedback Inhibition Influences Metabolite Secretion by the Human Gut Symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
Jennie L. Catlett, Jonathan Catazaro, Mikaela Cashman, Sean Carr, Robert Powers, Myra B. Cohen, Nicole R. Buan
mSystems Sep 2020, 5 (5) e00252-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00252-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSystems article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Metabolic Feedback Inhibition Influences Metabolite Secretion by the Human Gut Symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSystems
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSystems.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Metabolic Feedback Inhibition Influences Metabolite Secretion by the Human Gut Symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
Jennie L. Catlett, Jonathan Catazaro, Mikaela Cashman, Sean Carr, Robert Powers, Myra B. Cohen, Nicole R. Buan
mSystems Sep 2020, 5 (5) e00252-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00252-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacteroides
acetate
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
formate
metabolism
secretion
microbiome
fermentation
anaerobic
bacteria
NMR metabolomics

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSystems
  • Author Videos
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • Overleaf Pilot
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSystemsJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5077