Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Editor's Picks
    • Special Series: Sponsored Minireviews and Video Abstracts
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Novel Systems Biology Techniques
    • Early-Career Systems Microbiology Perspectives
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About mSystems
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSystems
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Editor's Picks
    • Special Series: Sponsored Minireviews and Video Abstracts
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Novel Systems Biology Techniques
    • Early-Career Systems Microbiology Perspectives
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About mSystems
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Applied and Environmental Science

Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Cycling Microbial Populations and Their Resistance to Global Change Depend on Soil C:N:P Stoichiometry

Gongwen Luo, Chao Xue, Qianhong Jiang, Yan Xiao, Fengge Zhang, Shiwei Guo, Qirong Shen, Ning Ling
James C. Stegen, Editor
Gongwen Luo
aJiangsu Provincial Key Lab for Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chao Xue
aJiangsu Provincial Key Lab for Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qianhong Jiang
aJiangsu Provincial Key Lab for Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan Xiao
bCollege of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fengge Zhang
bCollege of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shiwei Guo
aJiangsu Provincial Key Lab for Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qirong Shen
aJiangsu Provincial Key Lab for Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ning Ling
aJiangsu Provincial Key Lab for Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ning Ling
James C. Stegen
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00162-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Maintaining stability of ecosystem functions in the face of global change calls for a better understanding regulatory factors of functionally specialized microbial groups and their population response to disturbance. In this study, we explored this issue by collecting soils from 54 managed ecosystems in China and conducting a microcosm experiment to link disturbance, elemental stoichiometry, and genetic resistance. Soil carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus (C:N:P) stoichiometry imparted a greater effect on the abundance of microbial groups associated with main C, N, and P biogeochemical processes in comparison with mean annual temperature and precipitation. Nitrogen cycling genes, including bacterial amoA-b, nirS, narG, and norB, exhibited the highest genetic resistance to N deposition. The amoA-a and nosZ genes exhibited the highest resistance to warming and drying-wetting cycles, respectively. Soil total C, N, and P contents and their ratios had a strong direct effect on the genetic resistance of microbial groups, which was dependent on mean annual temperature and precipitation. Specifically, soil C/P ratio was the main predictor of N cycling genetic resistance to N deposition. Soil total C and N contents and their ratios were the main predictors of P cycling genetic resistance to N deposition, warming, and drying-wetting. Overall, our work highlights the importance of soil stoichiometric balance for maintaining the ability of ecosystem functions to withstand global change.

IMPORTANCE To be effective in predicting future stability of soil functions in the context of various external disturbances, it is necessary to follow the effects of global change on functionally specialized microbes related to C and nutrient cycling. Our study represents an exploratory effort to couple the stoichiometric drivers to microbial populations related with main C, N, and P cycling and their resistances to global change. The abundance of microbial groups involved in cellulose, starch, and xylan degradation, nitrification, N fixation, denitrification, organic P mineralization, and inorganic P dissolution showed a high stoichiometry dependency. Resistance of these microbial populations to global change could be predicted by soil C:N:P stoichiometry. Our work highlights that stoichiometric balance in soil C and nutrients is instrumental in maintaining the stability and adaptability of ecosystem functions under global change.

INTRODUCTION

Soil microorganisms contribute to multiple ecosystem functions, including litter decomposition, nutrient cycling, primary production and the regulation of greenhouse emissions (1, 2). The roles of functionally specialized groups of microbes that carry out ecosystem functions are of pivotal importance for carbon (C) and nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems (2, 3). For example, nitrogen (N) transformations such as fixation of atmospheric N into plant available ammonium, nitrification of ammonium into N oxides, and denitrification of NO3− into N2O and N2 are exclusively performed by diazotrophs, nitrifiers, and denitrifiers, respectively (4). When the ability of a species to perform its functions is hampered due to altered environmental conditions, other organisms may replace the lost functional component (2, 5). When there is species turnover across space or time due to environmental change, enhanced soil biodiversity can serve as a reservoir of specialized functional groups that complement each other, thus increasing overall ecosystem sustainability (5, 6). As environmental pressure continues, there may be a loss or suppression of key soil microbial groups (e.g., ammonia oxidizers, denitrifiers, and cellulolytic decomposers) that could result in an abrupt shift in multiple ecosystem functions. Therefore, functional microbes that carry out integral biogeochemical processes are necessary for proper ecosystem functions.

The growing human modification of terrestrial ecosystems has motivated ecologists to address how global change will impact the provisioning of multiple functions (7–9). Given the strong control that microbial communities exert over critical biogeochemical processes, there is a growing consensus that accurate predictions of future ecosystem stability require a more mechanistic understanding of the ability of functional populations to withstand disturbances (termed resistance) (2, 3, 10). Soil microbial functions are resilient after environmental change, though community composition is irreversibly altered (10, 11). When disturbances cease, nutrient biogeochemical cycling and C transformations depend solely on the remaining microbial populations. For example, organic matter decomposition, N mineralization, and nitrification appear to have a strong capacity to recover from drying and rewetting events (12–14). This resilience may be regulated by taxonomic groups that possess the functional capacity to synthesize enzymes that mitigate deleterious effects (15, 16). Exploring the effects of global change on specific microbial populations and their resistance is crucial in order to assess the stability and adaptability of ecosystem functions.

In the case of transient disturbances, numerous studies have reported stress-induced bursts of microbial C and N cycling. These tightly coupled processes may indeed be sensitive to projected climate change, such as warming and reduced precipitation (9, 17). Though soil microorganisms play a pivotal role in phosphorus (P) cycling through organic P mineralization and inorganic P dissolution, the impact of disturbances on microbially driven P fluxes has received much less attention than those of C and N (18). Overall, the main objectives of this study were to reveal the effects of mean annual temperature (MAT) and precipitation (MAP) and soil C:N:P stoichiometry on the microbial populations associated with the major pathways of C, N, and P cycling and to parallelly assess their integrated response to drying-wetting cycle, warming, and N deposition.

An increasing body of literature supports the idea that microbial communities exhibit spatial patterns at different scales (19). To more closely assess this pattern and to gain insight into the underlying functional processes and stability that are dependent on MAT and MAP and soil C:N:P stoichiometry (including soil total C, N, and P contents and their ratios), we used soils of 54 alfalfa planting systems from 21 provinces in China. Soil C:N:P stoichiometry constitutes an inherent link between biogeochemistry and the processes and structure within soil food webs (20). We hypothesized that the abundance of main C, N, and P cycling microbial groups would be mainly governed by soil C:N:P stoichiometry rather than MAT and MAP. Soil C and N biogeochemical cycling processes are sensitive to the projected climatic change (21, 22). Thus, we hypothesized that C and N cycling groups of alfalfa planting soils might be exhibited a higher resistance to N deposition than the drying-wetting cycles and warming. Microbial physiological feedback (such as regulating osmotic pressure) and functional recovery in response to stressors require a large investment of energy and resources (7, 23). Following this perspective, we further postulated that soil C:N:P stoichiometry might be a strong predictor of the population resistance of aforementioned functional groups. Soils were incubated subsequently for 1 month under different conditions simulating the expected impacts of changes in water availability (control versus drying-wetting cycles), temperature (control versus 4.5 °C warming), and N deposition (control versus 25 kg of N ha−1 year−1) (Fig. 1). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was employed to quantify the target genes associated with the biogeochemical cycling of C (cellulose, starch, and xylan degradation), N (nitrification, N fixation, and denitrification) and P (P mineralization and dissolution) (Table 1).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Fifty-four sampling sites were located in 21 provinces of China and spanned the major alfalfa growing region. These sites span a gradient of longitude and latitude and possess varied soil C:N:P stoichiometry (A). Considering the asymmetry in mean annual temperature and precipitation and soil C:N:P stoichiometry, the population patterns of C, N, and P cycling microbial groups may exist differently in the 54 sampling sites (B). Methodological framework explaining the design of microcosm experiments and the condition in all treatments (including the environmental control, drying-wetting cycles, warming, and N deposition treatments [C]). Varied population resistance of C, N, and P cycling groups may occur among sampling sites, and among functional genes (D). The letters C, N, and P in the circles represent different populations involved in the C, N, and P cycling processes, respectively. Diazotrophs regulate N fixation, nitrifiers regulate nitrification, nitrate reducers regulate nitrate reduction, denitrifiers regulate denitrification, P activators regulate organic P mineralization and inorganic P dissolution, and organic matter decomposers regulate cellulose, starch, and xylan degradation (Table 1). DW and WHC, drying-wetting and water holding capacity, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

The encoded protein and the functional process of each gene

RESULTS

Population abundance of functional microbial groups across ecosystem scales.Quantitative PCR was used to quantify the abundance of the genes associated with cellulose degradation (fungcbhIR and GH74 genes), starch degradation (GH31), xylan (or arabinan) degradation (GH51), nitrification (amoA-a and amoA-b), N fixation (nifH), and denitrification (narG, nirK, nirS, nosZ, and norB genes), organic P mineralization (phoD, phoC, and BPP genes), and inorganic P dissolution (pqqC) (Table 1). Inclusive of all sites, there was a positive relationship among the C, N, and P cycling microbial populations (R2 = 0.42 to ∼0.57; P < 0.001 [see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material]), and the significant relationships were observed among most of components of these populations (Fig. S2).

FIG S1

The relationships between the C, N, and P cycling microbial populations. The blue fitted lines are from the regression. Only significant fitted lines are displayed on the graphs. Shaded areas show 95% confidence intervals of the fit. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 0.9 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Luo et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Correlations among the C, N, and P cycling gene abundances. The matrix was produced based on percent identity in R statistical software using the package corrgram. Asterisks indicate significance at P values of <0.05, <0.01, and <0.001 (*, **, and ***, respectively), and the white space indicates that there was no significance. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 1.4 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Luo et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

MAT and MAP and soil C:N:P stoichiometry (including soil total C, N, and P contents and their ratios) impacted the abundances of C, N, and P cycling genes (Fig. 2A to C). Soil C:N:P stoichiometry (35% to ∼49%; P < 0.001) had a greater impact on the abundances than did the MAT and MAP (7% to ∼10%; P < 0.01) based on variance partitioning analysis. The variation explained jointly by these variables was 16% and 8% of the total variation in P and C cycling groups, respectively (Fig. 2A to C; P < 0.01).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

(A to C) Variance partitioning analysis map of the individual and combined explanatory power of mean annual temperature (MAT) and precipitation (MAP) and soil C:N:P stoichiometry on functional populations. Carbon cycling groups include the principal genes driving cellulose degradation (fungcbhIR and GH74), starch degradation (GH31), and xylan/arabinan degradation (GH51); N cycling groups include the genes driving nitrification (amoA-a and amoA-b), N fixation (nifH), and denitrification (narG, nirK, nirS, nosZ, and norB); and P cycling groups include the genes driving organic P mineralization (phoD, phoC, and BPP) and inorganic P dissolution (pqqC) (Table 1). Soil C:N:P stoichiometry includes soil total C, N, and P contents and their ratios. “M × S” stands for the variation explained jointly by MAT, MAP, and soil C:N:P stoichiometry. (D) The potential relationships of individual gene abundance with MAT, MAP, soil C:N:P stoichiometry, and bacterial and fungal abundance. The blue and red colors show, respectively, a negative and positive relationships between two variables. The deeper the color and the larger the circle, the stronger the relationships. The box without a circle indicates an absence of differences.

Heat map analysis of relational networks dissected the relationships between MAT and MAP and soil C:N:P stoichiometry against the abundance of C, N, and P cycling genes (Fig. 2D). Soil total N content, and soil C/P and N/P ratios, exhibited positive relationships with the majority of functional gene abundance (Fig. 2D; all P < 0.05). Soil total C content was positively related to the abundance of N cycling groups (including amoA-b, nifH, narG, nirS, and nosZ genes; all P < 0.05). Soil total P content was negatively correlated with the abundance of P activators (phoD and pqqC genes; all P < 0.05). Soil C/N ratio exhibited a negative relationship not only with the abundance of P activators (phoD, phoC, and pqqC genes) but also with denitrifiers (nirK) and cellulolytic decomposers (fungcbhIR and GH74 genes) (Fig. 2D; all P < 0.05). MAT or MAP was found to have a significant relationship only with the abundance of nirK, phoC, pqqC, and fungcbhIR genes. Bacterial and fungal abundance exhibited positive relationships with the majority of functional gene abundance, while the ratio of bacterial to fungal abundance was related to the gene abundance within C cycling groups (fungcbhIR, GH31, GH51, and GH74 genes) (Fig. 2D; all P < 0.05).

Population resistance of functional microbial-groups to simulated global change.Among the biomarkers of C, N, and P cycling groups, the phoD gene presented the lowest resistance to drying-wetting cycles, the nosZ and GH51 genes exhibited the lowest resistance to warming, and the GH51 and GH74 genes were least resistant to N deposition (Fig. S3). Nitrogen cycling genes, including amoA-b, nirS, narG, and norB, exhibited the highest genetic resistance values to N deposition, and the amoA-a and nosZ genes exhibited the highest resistance to warming and drying-wetting cycles, respectively (Fig. 3; all P < 0.05). The genetic resistance of P cycling genes (phoD and phoC) illustrated an absence of differences between warming and N deposition, while the resistance to the two stressors was higher than that to drying-wetting cycles and the resistance of BPP gene to warming and drying-wetting cycles was higher than that to N deposition (Fig. 3; all P < 0.05). Carbon cycling genes, including GH31, GH51, and GH74, exhibited lower genetic resistance to N deposition than to the drying-wetting cycles and warming (Fig. 3; all P < 0.05). Inclusive of all sites, there was a positive relationship among the C, N, and P cycling microbial populations under the three stressors (R2 = 0.33 to ∼0.62; P < 0.001 [Fig. S4]).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Effects of warming, drying-wetting cycles, and N deposition on the resistance of genes involved in C, N, and P cycling. Detailed information on functional genes is provided in Table 1. The upper and lower boundaries of each box indicate the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively, and the midline marks the median of the distribution of the resistance values. The asterisks indicate that the genes showed a significant difference in the resistance to the three perturbations.

FIG S3

Resistance of genes involved in C, N, and P cycling to drying-wetting cycles (A), warming (B), and N deposition (C). The following genes were assessed: fungcbhIR and GH74 as the biomarkers of cellulose degradation, GH31 as the biomarker of starch degradation, GH51 as the biomarker of xylan/arabinan degradation, amoA-a and amoA-b as the biomarkers of nitrification, nifH as the biomarker of N fixation, narG, nirK, nirS, nosZ, and norB as the biomarkers of denitrification, phoD and phoC as the biomarkers of organic P mineralization, BPP, as the biomarker of phytic acid mineralization, and pqqC as the biomarker of inorganic P dissolution (Table 1). Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.7 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Luo et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

The relationships between the C, N, and P cycling microbial populations after the simulated disturbance of drying-wetting cycle, warming, and N deposition. The blue fitted lines are from the regression. Only significant fitted lines are displayed on the graphs. Shaded areas show 95% confidence intervals of the fit. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 2.5 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Luo et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Regulatory pathway of multiple drivers on functional population resistances.Mean annual precipitation exhibited the highest mean predictor importance (MPI; 21%) in the explanation of N cycling genetic resistance to drying-wetting cycles (random forest models [Fig. 4]). Mean annual temperature exhibited the highest MPI (23%) in the explanation of N cycling genetic resistance to warming. Soil C/P ratio exhibited the highest MPI (15%) in the explanation of N cycling genetic resistance to N deposition, followed by the MAT and MAP (Fig. 4). Soil total C and N contents and their ratios were selected by random forest analyses as the main predictors of the P cycling genetic resistance to the three stressors. Soil C/P ratio (10%) and MAT (10%) exhibited the highest MPI in the explanation of C cycling genetic resistance to drying-wetting cycles, and parallelly soil total C (18%) and MAT (15%) exhibited the highest MPI in the explanation of C cycling genetic resistance to warming and N deposition, respectively (Fig. 4).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Random forest mean predictor importance (percentage of increase of mean square error [MSE]) of MAT and MAP and soil C:N:P stoichiometry as the drivers of C, N, and P cycling genetic resistance to warming, drying-wetting cycles, and N deposition. This accuracy importance was computed for each tree and averaged over the forest (500 trees). Blue fill indicates significance level at a P value of <0.05.

Assessment via structural equation modeling further provided mathematical evidence for the regulatory effect of the MAT and MAP and soil C:N:P stoichiometry on genetic resistance of the N, P, and C cycling microbial groups (Fig. 5). Both the MAT and MAP could directly affect soil C:N:P stoichiometry, which resulted in the ultimate regulation of genetic resistance (Fig. 5). For example, the MAP directly affected soil total N content and this regulatory effect mediated N cycling genetic resistance to climate change and N deposition. Soil C, N, and P contents and their ratios had a stronger direct effect on the genetic resistance of microbial groups. These drivers exhibited varied effects coefficient and direction among the three stressors (Fig. 5). For example, soil total C and N contents exhibited a consistently positive effect on the genetic resistance of N cycling groups, while the soil C/P ratio had a consistently positive effect on the genetic resistance of C, N, and P cycling microbial groups.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Structural equation modeling describing the effects of MAT and MAP and soil C:N:P stoichiometry on the population resistance of C, N, and P cycling microbial groups to drying-wetting cycles (A), warming (B), and N deposition (C). Solid and dashed arrows indicate the positive and negative effects, respectively. Numbers adjacent to arrows are indicative of the effect size of the relationship (termed standardized path coefficients). For simplicity, only significant direct effects were plotted (P < 0.05). R2 indicates the proportion of variance explained.

DISCUSSION

Effects of soil C:N:P stoichiometry on functionally specialized microbial populations.In agreement with our hypothesis, the abundance of main functional genes involved in the biogeochemical cycling of C (cellulose, starch, and xylan degradation), N (nitrification, N fixation, and denitrification), and P (organic P mineralization and inorganic P dissolution) was mainly governed by soil C:N:P stoichiometry rather than MAT and MAP (Fig. 2). This is consistent with previous work showing that multiple edaphic factors, including soil physicochemical properties, temperature, and moisture, either together or individually influence microbially driven processes (19, 24, 25).

This study provided the opportunity to reveal linkages that impact biologically mediated N transformation processes of alfalfa planting soils. For example, the abundance of diazotrophs (nifH gene) exhibited a positive relationship with that of nitrifiers, nitrate reducers, and denitrifiers (Fig. S2). In this ecosystem, inputs of N to soil are generally dependent on biological N fixation (4). The sequences of nosZ and nirS are amplified clustered with the N-fixing bacteria Azospirillum and Bradyrhizobium japonicum, which demonstrates a potential relationship between biological N fixation and denitrification (26). The subsequent production of ammonium (mineralization), conversion of ammonium to nitrate (nitrification), and loss of nitrate via denitrification should exhibit a dependence on the prerequisite process (4, 25). Thus, a broader appreciation of N biogeochemical cycling in ecosystems can be attained synthetically via simultaneous analyses of the populations of diazotrophs, nitrifiers, nitrate reducers, and denitrifiers. The C, N, and P requirements of microbial biomass differ among species and are not homeostatic through time (27, 28). As expected, the majority of N cycling gene abundances were related to soil C and N contents and to C/P and N/P ratios (Fig. 2). For example, the abundance of the nifH gene was correlated with soil total C and N contents because fixed N can drive interlinked N and C cycling events, including mycorrhizal symbiosis and litter decomposition (29), or N fixation in alfalfa planting soils can add to C availability. This finding suggests that resource allocation processes bring C and N acquisition into stoichiometric balance.

Soil P biochemical processes are tightly coupled to C and N cycling (30, 31), which supports the positive relationships between the functional populations involved in C, N, and P transformations (Fig. 2 and Fig. S1). For example, Bradyrhizobium, a free-living and symbiotic diazotroph, plays an important role in coupling soil N and P cycling. To respond to P stress, some Alphaproteobacteria (e.g., Bradyrhizobium species) sacrifice N in order to obtain more available P by altering expression of P cycling genes (such as phoD and phoC) or the catalytic efficiency of phosphatases (32–34). Soil total P content was negatively correlated with the abundance of the phoD and pqqC genes, which facilitate P availability by encoding exoenzymes (Fig. 2). This result was consistent with our previous studies (18). Soil phosphatase activity and phoD abundance have been found to be linearly negatively correlated with available P concentration (18, 35). Under high-P conditions, it is likely that the control of microbial population is driven not by P availability but by the need for C (36–38). Microbial phosphatases and other enzymes are also involved in organic C mineralization in order to promote the availability of P and C from organophosphorylated compounds (36, 37). Thus, P transformation is inherently coupled, to a degree, with C mineralization (Fig. S1 and S2). The high soil C/N ratio indicates efficient degradation of fresh plant matter, which is important for the subsequent C sequestration (39). Soil C/P and N/P ratios have been demonstrated as the main predictors of the abundance and diversity of the phoC- and phoD-harboring microbial populations. Therefore, the abundance of P cycling genes was correlated with soil total C, N, and P contents (Fig. 2). Gaining a deeper understanding of the environmental and resource dependency of functional populations and their ability to withstand disturbances can be used to predict the ecosystem service sustainability.

Stability of soil microbial functions to simulated global change.The abundances of genes involved in soil C, N, and P cycling were differentially resistant to stress induced by simulated global change (Fig. 3 and Fig. S3). The mechanisms responsible for these idiosyncrasies likely result from the various diversities, metabolic versatilities, and environmental tolerances of specific functional groups (40, 41) and reflect complex feedback loops within the soil-microorganism system. For example, both bacterial and fungal isolates are known to induce survival strategies against desiccation and rewetting, including the accumulation of compatible solutes studied for Streptomycetes (23), exopolysaccharide production studied in Pseudomonas and Acidobacteria (42), and the induction of dormant phases such as through spore production (16). Therefore, indigenous functional groups may select for characteristic patterns in responding to global change by implementing varied physiological strategies that render them tolerant across dynamic water potentials.

Due to the ecophysiological diversity within functional microbial groups (8, 9), it is unlikely that all members of a group share similar ecophysiological characteristics. Thus, they are unlikely to react to different disturbances in the same manner. The response of functional groups to drying-wetting cycles, warming, and N deposition, therefore, followed different genetic resistances (Fig. 3). The sensitivity of soil N cycling to climate change is well accepted, as it has been declared that comparably small changes of temperature or moisture regimens affect nitrification and gross or net N mineralization (43–45). Drought or reduced soil moisture generally decreases N mineralization rates (46, 47). As assumed, N cycling genes, including amoA-b, nirS, narG, and norB, exhibited a higher genetic resistance to N deposition than to the drying-wetting cycles and warming (Fig. 3). Nitrogen deposition elevated spatial heterogeneity of soil microbial communities (48, 49). Heterogeneity might enable those functional populations to cope better with an uncertain future, and cells can switch stochastically between the different expression states under this circumstance (50).

Carbon cycling genes, including GH31, GH51, and GH74, exhibited a lower genetic resistance to N deposition than to the drying-wetting cycles and warming (Fig. 3). The microbial species involved in organic matter decomposition primarily belong to the fungus groups (51) which are generally more drought resilient than other species and continue to increase in biomass under water stress conditions (52). Nitrogen addition can enhance microbial C limitation, which may be attributed to an increase in recalcitrant organic matter through condensation reactions between mineral N and organic matter (53). Thus, there was a relatively lower resistance to N deposition of genes involved in cellulose degradation (GH74), starch degradation (GH31), and xylan degradation (GH51) than to drying-wetting cycles and warming (Fig. 3). This finding implies a lower phenotypic plasticity of those functional populations in resisting N deposition. Both soil organic and inorganic P may be solubilized following drying and rewetting events, which often induces not only a substantial pulse in soil respiration but also a leaching of dissoluble P (54). To meet their needs for available P, microorganisms are expected to obtain more P by the release of hydrolytic phosphatase (mineralization) and organic anions (solubilization). This mechanical theory suggests that phosphatase-harboring populations (phoD and phoC genes) are especially susceptible to drying-wetting cycles, with a relatively lower genetic resistance than to N deposition and warming (Fig. 3). According to these findings, to be effective in detecting or predicting potential changes in soil functional processes in the context of various global changes, it is necessary to focus on the specific environmental drivers that impact particular microbial populations of interest.

Regulatory pathways of functional population resistance to global change.Microorganisms frequently experiencing environmental changes have been found to be more resistant to such disturbances than populations with less exposure to the disturbances. For example, intensified exposure to rainfall (i.e., larger rainfall scenes separated by longer dry cycles) increases the drying-rewetting tolerance of soil bacteria (55). This perspective supports the notion that the MAT and MAP were consistently identified as the principal drivers of genetic resistance to drying-wetting cycles (Fig. 4 and 5). It is unclear how global warming will affect N fixation, with some predicting that future arctic environments will experience increased N fixation because of heightened enzyme activities and increased CO2 concentration (56). Conversely, N fixation may be inhibited by increased available N due to increased mineralization acting as a negative feedback upon this process (57). These contradictory results may be caused by different local climates, as our results showed that the MAT was consistently a primary predictor of N cycling genetic resistance to simulated warming (Fig. 4 and 5). This finding extends the understanding that past climatic conditions and disturbance history leave their imprint on the composition and function of microbial communities.

The production of enzymes is nutritionally and energetically expensive, requiring microbial investment of C (energy) and nutrients (termed cells’ economic policy) (9, 58). This may be overridden when organisms acclimate to stress by altering their survival strategies, such as the dependence on the microbial selection of substrates with various soil C:N:P stoichiometry (59, 60). Soil total C, N, and P contents and their ratios had a strong direct effect on the genetic resistance of microbial groups, which were dependent on the MAT and MAP, based on both the random forest and structural equation models (Fig. 4 and 5). Despite the soil stoichiometry being impacted by the fertilization management in agroecosystems, most studies conducted across ecosystems have reported that the variation in ecological stoichiometry is driven by the latitude, MAT, and MAP (20, 61, 62). Based on the components of previous discussion, phosphatase activity is highly responsive to changes in C, N, and P availability, which represents an important strategy by which organisms might be able to adjust to changes in biogeochemical cycles. These interactive effects may explain why the present study identified soil C and N contents and C/N ratio as strong predictors of resistance within P cycling populations (Fig. 4 and 5). With a sufficient C supply, increasing N availability meets the microbial C:N stoichiometric requirement and thus stimulates microbial activity, thereby accelerating C mineralization (27, 63). Nutrient limitation of soils may lead to a shift in the microbes from r- to K-strategists, the latter of which are considered able to decompose more stable organic matter for organic N or P acquisition and thus induce a higher activity of decomposition (64, 65). These findings may explain why the present study identified that the soil C/P, N/P, and C/N ratios were strong predictors and drivers of stress resistance of functional populations (Fig. 4 and 5).

Our study provides novel evidence that the populations of microbial groups involved in C, N, and P cycling were mainly governed by soil C:N:P stoichiometry rather than MAT and MAP. The response of functional groups to global change followed varied patterns, with the majority of functional genes exhibiting differential resistance to the same external stressor. Soil C:N:P stoichiometry had a strong direct effect on the genetic resistance of microbial groups, which were dependent on the MAT and MAP. Therefore, it is of vital importance to understand how C:N:P stoichiometry mediates the ability of microbial functions to withstand global change.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Research site and soil sampling.Soils were collected from 54 major alfalfa cultivation systems that are located in 21 provinces of China and span a gradient of precipitation and temperature (Fig. 1A). The interplay of environmental factors and local management techniques influences the consequences of soil properties across sampling sites. There are three primary reasons for the use of alfalfa planting systems in the present study: (i) alfalfa is a widely distributed perennial plant in China, which makes it beneficial for large-scale and multisample research; (ii) soil C, N, and P pools in most systems are usually complicated by plant residues with multiple stoichiometric ratios, but long-term alfalfa cropping reduces the effects of aboveground components or other vegetation on soil substrates; and (iii) alfalfa-driven N fixation promotes the formation of specific stoichiometric gradients of soil substrates. Lastly, these planting systems experience lower artificial disturbance than do farmland systems. Three plots at each site were randomly selected, from which five soil cores per plot were taken at a depth of 0 to 15 cm and combined. These three plot-level samples were sieved through 2.0-mm mesh to remove plant debris and rocks and then mixed thoroughly on a per-site basis to generate the final composite soil samples.

Soil total C and N contents were determined by the dry combustion of ground samples (100 mesh) in an elemental analyzer (vario MAX; Elementar, Germany). Soil total P content was determined by digestion with HF-HClO4 and, ultimately, determined via molybdenum blue colorimetry (66).

Experimental design: soil incubation.Soils for the microcosm experiment were incubated to evaluate the effects of simulated drying-wetting cycles, warming, and N fertilization on the resistance of functional microbial groups. In parallel, 5 g of soil from each site was loaded into ventilated canning jars, one for each global driver plus an environmental control. The environmental control was incubated at 25°C, the average land surface temperature for all sites (https://neo.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/), at a 50% water holding capacity (WHC), the optimum water content for microbial respiration in soils with similar textures (67). The warming treatment had water conditions similar to those of the control but at an increased temperature (+4.5°C [Fig. 1C]). This temperature increase mimics global warming forecasts for the end of this century (17). The drying-wetting treatment was incubated at the same temperature as the control but included four cycles. Each cycle involved a 2-day wetting phase (a 50% soil WHC was achieved) and subsequent natural drying for 5 days (Fig. 1C). The N deposition treatment included the same temperature and water conditions as the control plus the equivalent of 25 kg of N ha−1 year−1, which was added in the form of NH4NO3 during the first watering (Fig. 1C). This amount was selected based on the evaluation of N deposition in China (68). Moisture content was adjusted and maintained at a 50% WHC throughout the experiment for all treatments other than the drying-wetting treatment. A total of 216 samples (54 sites × 4 treatments) were incubated under the four treatments for a month.

Quantifying functional groups.Total genomic soil DNA was extracted using a Power Soil DNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA extracts were purified using a Wizard DNA cleanup system (Axygen Bio, USA), as recommended by the manufacturer. The DNA was then stored at –20°C for subsequent analyses.

Potential microbial functions were assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) of the key genes involved in cellulose degradation, starch degradation, xylan degradation, nitrification, N fixation, denitrification, organic P mineralization, and inorganic P dissolution (Table 1). Biomarkers of the bacterial 16S rRNA and fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) rRNA genes were quantified to calculate the ratio of fungal and bacterial abundances. Primer sequences for the target genes were adapted for qPCR, based on previous studies (Table S1). After running a serial dilution on the samples to test for PCR inhibition, each gene assay was performed with each sample run in triplicate. Standard curves were obtained using serial dilutions of a known amount of linearized plasmid DNA containing specific gene fragments. Quantification was performed with an ABI 7500 Cycle real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Germany) in a 25-μl reaction mixture that included 12.5 μl of SYBR Premix Ex Taq (2×) (Tli RnaseH Plus), 0.5 μl of ROX reference dye II (50×) (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Japan), 0.5 μl of each primer (10 μM; forward primer and reverse primer), 1 μl of template, and 10 μl of double-distilled water (ddH2O) to bring the final volume up to 25 μl. Our method resulted in slightly different amplification efficiencies for these targeted genes, with R2 values between 0.94 and 0.98 (Table S1). These data were used to correct the gene abundance data before statistical analyses were performed.

TABLE S1

Primers used for quantitative PCR and corresponding amplification cycling conditions. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.03 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Luo et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Decoupling genetic resistance.Resistance (RS) was calculated as described by Orwin and Wardle (69):RS=1−(2|D0|C0+|D0|)(1)

In this equation, D0 is the difference in the value of the response variables between the constant-condition samples (C0) and the treated samples at the end of the incubation period. This RS index increases monotonically with resistance, considers only the absolute differences between controlled and disturbed soils, and is standardized by the control value to enable valid comparisons between soils. It is bounded at +1 and −1, where a value of +1 indicates complete resistance (i.e., the disturbance did not cause any change in the response variable), a value of 0 indicates that there was a 100% change in the response variable compared to the control soil, and a value of −1 indicates that there was a change of more than 100% in the response variable compared to the control soil. We calculated the resistance of each gene abundance independently for each global change driver.

Statistical analysis.We used following equation to normalize the gene abundance belonging to the same functional group (70):x'=[∑n=1n(xi/∑i=1ixi)]/n(i=1,2,3…;n=1,2,3…)(2)where xi is the individual gene abundance of the samples, i and n indicate the numbers of samples and genes studied, respectively, and x′ is the normalized abundance of the C, N, or P cycling microbial groups.

The statistical analyses were performed by using the IMB SPSS statistical software package version 20 (IBM Corporation, New York, NY) or R (version 3.1.1). Variance partitioning analysis with Hellinger-transformed data was used to determine the individual and combined variation explained by MAT and MAP and soil C:N:P stoichiometry on gene abundance. Soil C:N:P stoichiometry includes soil total C, N, and P contents and their ratios. A heat map was generated using the corrplot package to show the relationships of gene abundance with MAT, MAP, and soil C:N:P stoichiometry.

Classification random forest analysis proposed by Breiman (71), as described by Delgado-Baquerizo et al. (72), was employed to identify the most important and credible predictors of functional population resistance to global change within the components of soil C:N:P stoichiometry, MAT, and MAP. Random forest algorithms add an additional layer of randomness to bagging, and each tree used a different bootstrap sample of the data. The randomForest package provides an R interface to the Fortran programs implemented by Breiman and Cutler (http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/users/breiman/). The rfPermute package was used to estimate the significance of importance metrics for a random forest model by permuting the response variable. Random forest mean predictor importance (MPI) (percent increase in mean square error [MSE]) is used to characterize the main predictors.

Structural equation modeling (SEM) (73) was constructed to further reveal the indirect and direct effects of MAT, MAP, and soil C:N:P stoichiometry on the population resistance of functional groups to global change with a multivariate approach using AMOS software (IBM SPSS AMOS 20.0.0). Before such modeling, all data of model variables must be normalized. The first step in SEM requires establishing an a priori model based on the known effects and relationships among the stress resistance of functional populations, MAT, MAP, and soil C:N:P stoichiometry (Fig. S5). Variables included preselected major significant predictors of population resistance of functional groups from random forest analyses described above. The following metrics were used to evaluate the goodness of fit of our model: the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) (the model has a good fit when the RMSEA is low [<0.05]), the chi-square value (χ2; the model has a good fit when the χ2 value is low), Fisher’s P statistic (the model has a good fit when 0.05 < P ≤ 1.00), and the Akaike information criterion (AIC) (the model has a good fit when the AIC is low). The different goodness-of-fit metrics used indicated that our a priori model considering the direct paths between MAT/MAP and the resistance of functional populations was not fitted to our data. Additionally, this a priori model indicates that there were no significant paths between MAT/MAP and resistance. Therefore, we constructed an optimal model that does not consider the direct (but indirect) effects of MAT and MAP on the resistance of functional populations (the paths between them were deleted in the optimal model). Ultimately, the resulting model was obtained by gradually modifying and optimizing the a priori model, which met the condition of goodness-of-fit metrics and confirmed the significance of paths.

FIG S5

A priori structural equation model including direct and indirect effects of MAT, MAP, and soil C:N:P stoichiometry on the genetic resistance of microbial groups to N deposition, warming, and drying-wetting cycles. Download FIG S5, TIF file, 1.1 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Luo et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Data availability.Our data set is publicly available through the Dryad database at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.05qfttf0d.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the large number of assistants who helped to collect site information and soil samples. This study was equally supported by funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41977080), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0200805), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (KYZ201718).

We especially thank C. Ryan Penton of Arizona State University for manuscript editing.

We declare no conflict of interest.

N.L., Q.S., G.L., and S.G. conceived and designed the experiment. G.L., Q.J., Y.X., and F.Z. performed the experiment. G.L. analyzed the data. G.L. and N.L. wrote the manuscript. C.X., S.G., and Q.S. made plentiful valuable comments for the manuscript. All the authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received February 21, 2020.
    • Accepted June 5, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 Luo et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Wagg C,
    2. Bender SF,
    3. Widmer F,
    4. van der Heijden MG
    . 2014. Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:5266–5270. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320054111.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bender SF,
    2. Wagg C,
    3. van der Heijden MG
    . 2016. An underground revolution: biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability. Trends Ecol Evol 31:440–452. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Luo G,
    2. Wang T,
    3. Li K,
    4. Li L,
    5. Zhang J,
    6. Guo S,
    7. Shen Q
    . 2019. Historical nitrogen deposition and straw addition facilitate the resistance of soil multifunctionality to drying-wetting cycles. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e02251-18. doi:10.1128/AEM.02251-18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Levy-Booth DJ,
    2. Prescott CE,
    3. Grayston SJ
    . 2014. Microbial functional genes involved in nitrogen fixation, nitrification and denitrification in forest ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 75:11–25. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.021.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mori AS,
    2. Isbell F,
    3. Fujii S,
    4. Makoto K,
    5. Matsuoka S,
    6. Osono T
    . 2016. Low multifunctional redundancy of soil fungal diversity at multiple scales. Ecol Lett 19:249–259. doi:10.1111/ele.12560.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Zavaleta ES,
    2. Pasari JR,
    3. Hulvey KB,
    4. Tilman GD
    . 2010. Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:1443–1446. doi:10.1073/pnas.0906829107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Székely AJ,
    2. Langenheder S
    . 2017. Dispersal timing and drought history influence the response of bacterioplankton to drying-rewetting stress. ISME J 11:1764–1776. doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.55.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Delgado-Baquerizo M,
    2. Eldridge DJ,
    3. Ochoa V,
    4. Gozalo B,
    5. Singh BK,
    6. Maestre FT
    . 2017. Soil microbial communities drive the resistance of ecosystem multifunctionality to global change in drylands across the globe. Ecol Lett 20:1295–1305. doi:10.1111/ele.12826.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mooshammer M,
    2. Hofhansl F,
    3. Frank AH,
    4. Wanek W,
    5. Hämmerle I,
    6. Leitner S,
    7. Schnecker J,
    8. Wild B,
    9. Watzka M,
    10. Keiblinger KM,
    11. Zechmeister-Boltenstern S,
    12. Richter A
    . 2017. Decoupling of microbial carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling in response to extreme temperature events. Sci Adv 3:e1602781. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602781.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Griffiths BS,
    2. Philippot L
    . 2013. Insights into the resistance and resilience of the soil microbial community. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:112–129. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00343.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. McKew BA,
    2. Taylor JD,
    3. McGenity TJ,
    4. Underwood G
    . 2011. Resistance and resilience of benthic biofilm communities from a temperate saltmarsh to desiccation and rewetting. ISME J 5:30–41. doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Phillips LA,
    2. Schefe CR,
    3. Fridman M,
    4. O’Halloran N,
    5. Armstrong RD,
    6. Mele PM
    . 2015. Organic nitrogen cycling microbial communities are abundant in a dry Australian agricultural soil. Soil Biol Biochem 86:201–211. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.04.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Guénon R,
    2. Gros R
    . 2013. Frequent-wildfires with shortened time-since-fire affect soil microbial functional stability to drying and rewetting events. Soil Biol Biochem 57:663–674. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gao J,
    2. Feng J,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Yu FH,
    5. Xu X,
    6. Kuzyakov Y
    . 2016. Drying-rewetting cycles alter carbon and nitrogen mineralization in litter-amended alpine wetland soil. Catena 145:285–290. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.026.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Placella SA,
    2. Brodie EL,
    3. Firestone MK
    . 2012. Rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses result from sequential resuscitation of phylogenetically clustered microbial groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:10931–10936. doi:10.1073/pnas.1204306109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Barnard RL,
    2. Osborne CA,
    3. Firestone MK
    . 2013. Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to extreme desiccation and rewetting. ISME J 7:2229–2241. doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Stocker TF,
    2. Qin D,
    3. Plattner G-K,
    4. Tignor M,
    5. Allen SK,
    6. Boschung J,
    7. Nauels A,
    8. Xia Y,
    9. Bex V,
    10. Midgley PM
    (ed). 2013. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Luo G,
    2. Ling N,
    3. Nannipieri P,
    4. Chen H,
    5. Raza W,
    6. Wang M,
    7. Guo S,
    8. Shen Q
    . 2017. Long-term fertilisation regimes affect the composition of the alkaline phosphomonoesterase encoding microbial community of a vertisol and its derivative soil fractions. Biol Fertil Soils 53:375–388. doi:10.1007/s00374-017-1183-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Bru D,
    2. Ramette A,
    3. Saby NPA,
    4. Dequiedt S,
    5. Ranjard L,
    6. Jolivet C,
    7. Arrouays D,
    8. Philippot L
    . 2011. Determinants of the distribution of nitrogen-cycling microbial communities at the landscape scale. ISME J 5:532–542. doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Zechmeister-Boltenstern S,
    2. Keiblinger KM,
    3. Mooshammer M,
    4. Peñuelas J,
    5. Richter A,
    6. Sardans J,
    7. Wanek W
    . 2015. The application of ecological stoichiometry to plant–microbial–soil organic matter transformations. Ecol Monogr 85:133–155. doi:10.1890/14-0777.1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Solomon S,
    2. Qin D,
    3. Manning M,
    4. Chen Z,
    5. Marquis M,
    6. Averyt KB,
    7. Tignor M,
    8. Miller HL
    (ed). 2007. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, vol 4, p 236–265. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Unteregelsbacher S,
    2. Gasche R,
    3. Lipp L,
    4. Sun W,
    5. Kreyling O,
    6. Geitlinger H,
    7. Kögel-Knabner I,
    8. Papen H,
    9. Kiese R,
    10. Schmid PH,
    11. Dannenmann M
    . 2013. Increased methane uptake but unchanged nitrous oxide flux in montane grasslands under simulated climate change conditions. Eur J Soil Sci 64:586–596. doi:10.1111/ejss.12092.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Schimel J,
    2. Balser TC,
    3. Wallenstein M
    . 2007. Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 88:1386–1394. doi:10.1890/06-0219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Walker JK,
    2. Egger KN,
    3. Henry GH
    . 2008. Long-term experimental warming alters nitrogen-cycling communities but site factors remain the primary drivers of community structure in high arctic tundra soils. ISME J 2:982–995. doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Forbes MS,
    2. Broos K,
    3. Baldock JA,
    4. Gregg AL,
    5. Wakelin SA
    . 2009. Environmental and edaphic drivers of microbial communities involved in soil N cycling. Soil Res 47:380–388. doi:10.1071/SR08126.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Rösch C,
    2. Mergel A,
    3. Bothe H
    . 2002. Biodiversity of denitrifying and dinitrogen-fixing bacteria in an acid forest soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3818–3829. doi:10.1128/aem.68.8.3818-3829.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Cleveland CC,
    2. Liptzin D
    . 2007. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfeld ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry 85:235–252. doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hartman WH,
    2. Richardson CJ
    . 2013. Differential nutrient limitation of soil microbial biomass and metabolic quotients (qCO2): is there a biological stoichiometry of soil microbes? PLoS One 8:e57127. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057127.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Larsen MJ,
    2. Jurgensen MF,
    3. Harvey AE
    . 1978. N2-fixation associated with wood decayed by some common fungi in western Montana. Can J Res 8:341–345. doi:10.1139/x78-050.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. Mikha MM,
    2. Rice CW,
    3. Milliken GA
    . 2005. Carbon and nitrogen mineralization as affected by drying and wetting cycles. Soil Biol Biochem 37:339–347. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.08.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Marklein AR,
    2. Houlton BZ
    . 2012. Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 193:696–704. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03967.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Al-Niemi TS,
    2. Summers ML,
    3. Elkins JG,
    4. Kahn ML,
    5. McDermott TR
    . 1997. Regulation of the phosphate stress response in Rhizobium meliloti by PhoB. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4978–4981. doi:10.1128/AEM.63.12.4978-4981.1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Allison S
    . 2005. Cheaters, diffusion and nutrients constrain decomposition bymicrobial enzymes in spatially structured environments. Ecol Lett 8:626–635. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00756.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Houlton BZ,
    2. Wang YP,
    3. Vitousek P,
    4. Field C
    . 2008. A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere. Nature 454:327–330. doi:10.1038/nature07028.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Fraser T,
    2. Lynch DH,
    3. Entz MH,
    4. Dunfield KE
    . 2015. Linking alkaline phosphatase activity with bacterial phoD gene abundance in soil from a long-term management trial. Geoderma 257-258:115–122. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.10.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Heuck C,
    2. Weig A,
    3. Spohn M
    . 2015. Soil microbial biomass C:N:P stoichiometry and microbial use of organic phosphorus. Soil Biol Biochem 85:119–129. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.029.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    1. Spohn M,
    2. Kuzyakov Y
    . 2013. Phosphorus mineralization can be driven by microbial need for carbon. Soil Biol Biochem 61:69–75. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.02.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    1. Spohn M,
    2. Kuzyakov Y
    . 2013. Distribution of microbial- and root-derived phosphatase activities in the rhizosphere depending on P availability and C allocation-coupling soil zymography with 14C imaging. Soil Biol Biochem 67:106–113. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.015.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    1. Potter KN,
    2. Torbert HA,
    3. Jones OR,
    4. Matocha JE,
    5. Morrison JE,
    6. Unger PW
    . 1998. Distribution and amount of soil organic C in long-term management systems in Texas. Soil Tillage Res 47:309–321. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00119-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Horz HP,
    2. Barbrook A,
    3. Field CB,
    4. Bohannan B
    . 2004. Ammoniaoxidizing bacteria respond to multifactorial global change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:15136–11514. doi:10.1073/pnas.0406616101.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Brankatschk R,
    2. Töwe S,
    3. Kleineidam K,
    4. Schloter M,
    5. Zeyer J
    . 2011. Abundances and potential activities of nitrogen cycling microbial communities along a chronosequence of a glacier forefield. ISME J 5:1025–1037. doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Chang WS,
    2. van de Mortel M,
    3. Nielsen L,
    4. Nino de Guzman G,
    5. Li X,
    6. Halverson LJ
    . 2007. Alginate production by Pseudomonas putida creates a hydrated microenvironment and contributes to biofilm architecture and stress tolerance under water-limiting conditions. J Bacteriol 189:8290–8299. doi:10.1128/JB.00727-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Rustad LE,
    2. Campbell J,
    3. Marion G,
    4. Norby R,
    5. Mitchell M,
    6. Hartley A,
    7. Cornelissen J,
    8. Gurevitch J
    , GCTE-NEWS. 2001. A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126:543–562. doi:10.1007/s004420000544.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    1. Shaver GR,
    2. Bret-Harte MS,
    3. Jones MH,
    4. Johnstone J,
    5. Gough L,
    6. Laundre J,
    7. Chapin FS
    . 2001. Species composition interacts with fertilizer to control long-term change in tundra productivity. Ecology 82:3163–3181. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3163:SCIWFT]2.0.CO;2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Hart SC
    . 2006. Potential impacts of climate change on nitrogen transformations and greenhouse gas fluxes in forests: a soil transfer study. Global Change Biol 12:1032–1046. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01159.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. 46.↵
    1. Emmett BA,
    2. Beier C,
    3. Estiarte M,
    4. Tietema A,
    5. Kristensen HL,
    6. Williams D,
    7. Peñuelas J,
    8. Schmidt I,
    9. Sowerby A
    . 2004. The response of soil processes to climate change: results from manipulation studies of shrublands across an environmental gradient. Ecosystems 7:625–637. doi:10.1007/s10021-004-0220-x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. 47.↵
    1. Larsen KS,
    2. Andresen LC,
    3. Beier C,
    4. Jonasson S,
    5. Albert KR,
    6. Ambus PER,
    7. Arndal MF,
    8. Carter MS,
    9. Christensen S,
    10. Holmstrup M,
    11. Ibrom A,
    12. Kongstad J,
    13. Van Der Linden L,
    14. Maraldo K,
    15. Michelsen A,
    16. Mikkelsen TN,
    17. Pilegaard KIM,
    18. Priemé A,
    19. Ro-Poulsen H,
    20. Schmidt IK,
    21. Selsted MB,
    22. Stevnbak K
    . 2011. Reduced N cycling in response to elevated CO2, warming, and drought in a Danish heathland: synthesizing results of the CLIMAITE project after two years of treatments. Global Change Biol 17:1884–1899. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02351.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Guo C,
    3. Jian S,
    4. Deng Q,
    5. Yu CL,
    6. Dzantor KE,
    7. Hui DF
    . 2018. Nitrogen fertilization elevated spatial heterogeneity of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in switchgrass and gamagrass croplands. Sci Rep 8:1734. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-18486-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. 49.↵
    1. Ling N,
    2. Chen D,
    3. Guo H,
    4. Wei J,
    5. Bai Y,
    6. Shen Q,
    7. Hu SJ
    . 2017. Differential responses of soil bacterial communities to longterm N and P inputs in a semi-arid steppe. Geoderma 292:25–33. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Thattai M,
    2. Van OA
    . 2004. Stochastic gene expression in fluctuating environments. Genetics 167:523–530. doi:10.1534/genetics.167.1.523.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Kellner H,
    2. Luis P,
    3. Buscot F
    . 2007. Diversity of laccase-like multicopper oxidase genes in Morchellaceae: identification of genes potentially involved in extracellular activities related to plant litter decay. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 61:153–163. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00322.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Bauhus J,
    2. Khanna PK
    . 1994. Carbon and nitrogen turnover in two acid forest soils of southeast Australia as affected by phosphorus addition and drying and rewetting cycles. Biol Fertil Soils 17:212–218. doi:10.1007/BF00336325.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. 53.↵
    1. Sollins P,
    2. Homann P,
    3. Caldwell BA
    . 1996. Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter: mechanisms and controls. Geoderma 74:65–105. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(96)00036-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Bünemann EK,
    2. Keller B,
    3. Hoop D,
    4. Jud K,
    5. Boivin P,
    6. Frossard E
    . 2013. Increased availability of phosphorus after drying and rewetting of a grassland soil: processes and plant use. Plant Soil 370:511–526. doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1651-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    1. Evans SE,
    2. Wallenstein MD
    . 2014. Climate change alters ecological strategies of soil bacteria. Ecol Lett 17:155–164. doi:10.1111/ele.12206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Chapin DM,
    2. Bledsoe CS
    . 1992. Nitrogen fixation in arctic plant communities, p 301–319. In Chapin FS, III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J (ed), Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate: an ecophysiological perspective. Academic Press, Toronto, Canada.
  57. 57.↵
    1. Paul EA,
    2. Clark FE
    . 1996. Soil microbiology and biochemistry, 2nd ed. Academic Press, Toronto, Canada.
  58. 58.↵
    1. Schimel JP,
    2. Weintraub MN
    . 2003. The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem 35:549–563. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00015-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    1. Berggren M,
    2. Laudon H,
    3. Jansson M
    . 2007. Landscape regulation of bacterial growth efficiency in boreal freshwaters. Global Biogeochem Cycles 21:1–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. 60.↵
    1. Manzoni S,
    2. Jackson RB,
    3. Trofymow JA,
    4. Porporato A
    . 2008. The global stoichiometry of litter nitrogen mineralization. Science 321:684–686. doi:10.1126/science.1159792.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. Ordonez JC,
    2. van Bodegom PM,
    3. Witte JPM,
    4. Wright IJ,
    5. Reich PB,
    6. Aerts R
    . 2009. A global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility. Global Ecol Biogeogr 18:137–149. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00441.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. 62.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Li C,
    3. Wang ML
    . 2019. Linkages of C:N:P stoichiometry between soil and leaf and their response to climatic factors along altitudinal gradients. J Soils Sediments 19:1820–1829. doi:10.1007/s11368-018-2173-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.↵
    1. Qiu Q,
    2. Wu L,
    3. Ouyang Z,
    4. Li B,
    5. Xu Y,
    6. Wu S,
    7. Gregorich EG
    . 2016. Priming effect of maize residue and urea N on soil organic matter changes with time. Appl Soil Ecol 100:65–74. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.11.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. 64.↵
    1. Luo Y,
    2. Durenkamp M,
    3. Lin Q,
    4. Nobili M,
    5. Devonshire BJ,
    6. Brookes PC
    . 2013. Microbial biomass growth, following incorporation of biochars produced at 350°C or 700°C, in a silty-clay loam soil of high and low pH. Soil Biol Biochem 57:513–523. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.033.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. 65.↵
    1. Chen R,
    2. Senbayram M,
    3. Blagodatsky S,
    4. Myachina O,
    5. Dittert K,
    6. Lin X,
    7. Blagodatskaya E,
    8. Kuzyakov Y
    . 2014. Soil C and N availability determine the priming effect: microbial N mining and stoichiometric decomposition theories. Glob Chang Biol 20:2356–2367. doi:10.1111/gcb.12475.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. 66.↵
    1. Jackson ML
    . 1958. Soil chem analysis, p 162–164. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  67. 67.↵
    1. Setia R,
    2. Marschner P,
    3. Baldock J,
    4. Chittleborough D,
    5. Smith P,
    6. Smith J
    . 2011. Salinity effects on carbon mineralization in soils of varying texture. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1908–1916. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.05.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. 68.↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Han W,
    4. Tang A,
    5. Shen J,
    6. Cui Z,
    7. Vitousek P,
    8. Erisman JW,
    9. Goulding K,
    10. Christie P,
    11. Fangmeier A,
    12. Zhang F
    . 2013. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 494:459–462. doi:10.1038/nature11917.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. 69.↵
    1. Orwin KH,
    2. Wardle DA
    . 2004. New indices for quantifying the resistance and resilience of soil biota to exogenous disturbances. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1907–1912. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.036.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  70. 70.↵
    1. Luo G,
    2. Friman V-P,
    3. Chen H,
    4. Liu M,
    5. Wang M,
    6. Guo S,
    7. Ling N,
    8. Shen Q
    . 2018. Long-term fertilization regimes drive the abundance and composition of N-cycling-related prokaryotic groups via soil particle-size differentiation. Soil Biol Biochem 116:213–223. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.015.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  71. 71.↵
    1. Breiman L
    . 2001. Random forest. Mach Learn 45:5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. 72.↵
    1. Delgado-Baquerizo M,
    2. Maestre FT,
    3. Reich PB,
    4. Jeffries TC,
    5. Gaitan JJ,
    6. Encinar D,
    7. Berdugo M,
    8. Campbell CD,
    9. Singh BK
    . 2016. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat Commun 7:10541. doi:10.1038/ncomms10541.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. 73.↵
    1. Grace JB
    . 2006. Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  74. 74.↵
    1. Collavino MM,
    2. Tripp HJ,
    3. Frank IE,
    4. Vidoz ML,
    5. Calderoli PA,
    6. Donato M,
    7. Zehr JP,
    8. Aguilar OM
    . 2014. nifH pyrosequencing reveals the potential for location-specific soil chemistry to influence N2-fixing community dynamics. Environ Microbiol 16:3211–3223. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12423.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  75. 75.↵
    1. Bru D,
    2. Sarr A,
    3. Philippot L
    . 2007. Relative abundances of proteobacterial membrane-bound and periplasmic nitrate reductases in selected environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5971–5974. doi:10.1128/AEM.00643-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. 76.↵
    1. Levy-Booth DJ,
    2. Winder RS
    . 2010. Quantification of nitrogen reductase and nitrite reductase genes in soil of thinned and clear-cut Douglas-fir stands by using real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:7116–7125. doi:10.1128/AEM.02188-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. 77.↵
    1. Throbäck IN,
    2. Enwall K,
    3. Jarvis Å,
    4. Hallin S
    . 2004. Reassessing PCR primers targeting nirS, nirK and nosZ genes for community surveys of denitrifying bacteria with DGGE. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 49:401–417. doi:10.1016/j.femsec.2004.04.011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  78. 78.↵
    1. Kathuria S,
    2. Martiny AC
    . 2011. Prevalence of a calcium-based alkaline phosphatase associated with the marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus and other ocean bacteria. Environ Microbiol 13:74–83. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02310.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  79. 79.↵
    1. Gaiero JR,
    2. Bent E,
    3. Fraser TD,
    4. Condron LM,
    5. Dunfield KE
    . 2018. Validating novel oligonucleotide primers targeting three classes of bacterial non-specific acid phosphatase genes in grassland soils. Plant Soil 427:39–51. doi:10.1007/s11104-017-3338-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  80. 80.↵
    1. Huang H,
    2. Shao N,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Luo H,
    5. Yang P,
    6. Zhou Z,
    7. Zhan Z,
    8. Yao B
    . 2009. A novel beta-propeller phytase from Pedobacter nyackensis MJ11 CGMCC 2503 with potential as an aquatic feed additive. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 83:249–259. doi:10.1007/s00253-008-1835-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. 81.↵
    1. Kellner H,
    2. Zak DR,
    3. Vandenbol M
    . 2010. Fungi unearthed: transcripts encoding lignocellulolytic and chitinolytic enzymes in forest soil. PLoS One 5:e10971. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010971.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Cycling Microbial Populations and Their Resistance to Global Change Depend on Soil C:N:P Stoichiometry
Gongwen Luo, Chao Xue, Qianhong Jiang, Yan Xiao, Fengge Zhang, Shiwei Guo, Qirong Shen, Ning Ling
mSystems Jun 2020, 5 (3) e00162-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00162-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSystems article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Cycling Microbial Populations and Their Resistance to Global Change Depend on Soil C:N:P Stoichiometry
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSystems
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSystems.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Cycling Microbial Populations and Their Resistance to Global Change Depend on Soil C:N:P Stoichiometry
Gongwen Luo, Chao Xue, Qianhong Jiang, Yan Xiao, Fengge Zhang, Shiwei Guo, Qirong Shen, Ning Ling
mSystems Jun 2020, 5 (3) e00162-20; DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00162-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

global change
ecosystem function
functional gene
biogeochemical process
C mineralization
nutrient transformation
resistance
stoichiometry

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSystems
  • Author Videos
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • Overleaf Pilot
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSystemsJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5077