Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Special Series: Sponsored Minireviews and Video Abstracts
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Novel Systems Biology Techniques
    • Early-Career Systems Microbiology Perspectives
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About mSystems
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSystems
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Special Series: Sponsored Minireviews and Video Abstracts
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Novel Systems Biology Techniques
    • Early-Career Systems Microbiology Perspectives
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About mSystems
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Is Associated with Altered Bile Acid Metabolism in Infantile Cholestasis

Yizhong Wang, Xuefeng Gao, Xinyue Zhang, Yongmei Xiao, Jiandong Huang, Dongbao Yu, Xiaolu Li, Hui Hu, Ting Ge, Dan Li, Ting Zhang
Pieter C. Dorrestein, Editor
Yizhong Wang
aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Shanghai Children’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xuefeng Gao
bDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
cShenzhen University Clinical Medical Academy, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xinyue Zhang
aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Shanghai Children’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yongmei Xiao
aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Shanghai Children’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiandong Huang
dShenzhen HRK Bio-Tech Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dongbao Yu
dShenzhen HRK Bio-Tech Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaolu Li
aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Shanghai Children’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hui Hu
aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Shanghai Children’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ting Ge
aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Shanghai Children’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dan Li
aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Shanghai Children’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ting Zhang
aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Shanghai Children’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pieter C. Dorrestein
University of California, San Diego
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00463-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The co-occurrence of gut microbiota dysbiosis and bile acid (BA) metabolism alteration has been reported in several human liver diseases. However, the gut microbiota dysbiosis in infantile cholestatic jaundice (CJ) and the linkage between gut bacterial changes and alterations of BA metabolism have not been determined. To address this question, we performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing to determine the alterations in the gut microbiota of infants with CJ, and assessed their association with the fecal levels of primary and secondary BAs. Our data reveal that CJ infants show marked declines in the fecal levels of primary BAs and most secondary BAs. A decreased ratio of cholic acid (CA)/chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) in infants with CJ indicated a shift in BA synthesis from the primary pathway to the alternative BA synthesis pathway. The bacterial taxa enriched in infants with CJ corresponded to the genera Clostridium, Gemella, Streptococcus, and Veillonella and the family Enterobacteriaceae and were negatively correlated with the fecal BA level and the CDCA/CA ratio but positively correlated with the serological indexes of impaired liver function. An increased ratio of deoxycholic acid (DCA)/CA was observed in a proportion of infants with CJ. The bacteria depleted in infants with CJ, including Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, were positively and negatively correlated with the fecal levels of BAs and the serological markers of impaired liver function, respectively. In conclusion, the reduced concentration of BAs in the gut of infants with CJ is correlated with gut microbiota dysbiosis. The altered gut microbiota of infants with CJ likely upregulates the conversion from primary to secondary BAs.

IMPORTANCE Liver health, fecal bile acid (BA) concentrations, and gut microbiota composition are closely connected. BAs and the microbiome influence each other in the gut, where bacteria modify the BA profile, while intestinal BAs regulate the growth of commensal bacteria, maintain the barrier integrity, and modulate the immune system. Previous studies have found that the co-occurrence of gut microbiota dysbiosis and BA metabolism alteration is present in many human liver diseases. Our study is the first to assess the gut microbiota composition in infantile cholestatic jaundice (CJ) and elucidate the linkage between gut bacterial changes and alterations of BA metabolism. We observed reduced levels of primary BAs and most secondary BAs in infants with CJ. The reduced concentration of fecal BAs in infantile CJ was associated with the overgrowth of gut bacteria with a pathogenic potential and the depletion of those with a potential benefit. The altered gut microbiota of infants with CJ likely upregulates the conversion from primary to secondary BAs. Our study provides a new perspective on potential targets for gut microbiota intervention directed at the management of infantile CJ.

INTRODUCTION

Infantile cholestatic jaundice (CJ) is defined as jaundice caused by elevated conjugated bilirubin in infancy (1). The incidence of CJ is about 1 in 2,500 term infants (2). Infantile CJ is uncommon but potentially indicates severe liver disease (3). It was shown that several life-threatening disorders may have cholestasis as a major presenting sign of underlying neonatal liver disease (4). The early detection of CJ and accurate diagnosis are very important for optimal treatment and a favorable prognosis (3). The etiologies of CJ are complex, including biliary obstruction/structural abnormalities and genetic/metabolic disorders (3, 4). The major biliary obstruction/structural abnormality causes of CJ in infancy are biliary atresia, duct gallstones, and choledochal cyst (3, 4). Genetic/metabolic disorder causes of CJ include alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, galactosemia, hypopituitarism, tyrosinemia, progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis, cystic fibrosis, and panhypopituitarism (3). Additional causes of CJ are neonatal hepatitis, viral infection, and parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease (3, 5).

The common clinical feature of CJ is cholestasis, which is defined as reduced bile formation or flow, resulting in the retention of substances normally excreted into bile (1). Bile is produced by the liver and stored and concentrated in the gallbladder. The main components of bile are water, electrolytes, and organic molecules, including bile acids (BAs), cholesterol, phospholipids, and bilirubin (6). The BAs in bile are derived from the catabolism of highly insoluble cholesterol, which facilitates the digestion and absorption of dietary lipids and fat-soluble vitamins in the small intestine (7). The primary BAs, cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), are synthesized in the liver, stored in the gallbladder, and discharged into the small intestine after eating and play important physiological functions in food digestion and waste product elimination (6). The majority (about 95%) of primary BAs are efficiently reabsorbed from the terminal ileum (8). The remainder (about 5%) reach the colon, where they are deconjugated, dehydrogenated, and dehydroxylated by the intestinal bacteria to form secondary BAs and passively absorbed into the portal circulation (9). Once they return to the liver, the BAs are reconjugated and then resecreted together with newly synthesized bile salts. This overall process constitutes one cycle of the enterohepatic circulation. BAs have multiple endocrine functions as regulators of hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism, liver regeneration, inflammation, and the gut microbiota (7, 10). Cholestasis results in the abnormal accumulation of bile salts, bilirubin, and lipids in liver and the blood, impairing bile-mediated physiological functions (5).

The gut microbiota is a large and diverse community of microorganisms that contribute to human health and disease (11). The human gut microbiota facilitates harvesting of nutrients and energy from the ingested food and produces numerous metabolites to regulate host metabolism and immune functions (11). The gut microbiota plays a central role in the metabolism of BAs by regulating deconjugation, dehydroxylation, dehydrogenation, and epimerization to convert primary BAs into unconjugated secondary and free BAs (12). It has been shown that the gut microbiota modulates BA synthesis by regulating the expression of enzymes for BA formation (13). BA deconjugation is catalyzed by bacteria with bile salt hydrolase activity (14). Deconjugated primary BAs that escape reuptake in the small intestine are then deconjugated and dehydroxylated into secondary BAs by the 7α-dehydroxylating microbiome (15). Conversely, BAs also act as inhibitors of the gut microbiome via antimicrobial effects on gut microbes by damaging bacterial membranes and altering the intracellular macromolecular structure (14) and via indirect effects through the activation of innate immune genes in the small intestine, such as nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR)-induced antimicrobial peptides (16).

The co-occurrence of gut microbiota dysbiosis and BA metabolism alteration has been shown in many human liver diseases, including nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (17, 18), primary biliary cholangitis (19), primary sclerosing cholangitis (20), and liver cholestasis (21–25), but data on pediatric populations are lacking. In the current study, we aimed to assess the mutual influences between the altered gut microbial community and BA metabolism in infantile CJ.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics of infants with CJ.As shown in Table 1, of those 56 infants with CJ enrolled in the study, 34 (34/56, 60.7%) were boys. The median age at diagnosis was 67 days (interquartile range [IQR], 55.0, 93.5 days). Fourteen infants (14/56, 25.0%) were diagnosed with biliary atresia, and eight infants (8/56, 14.3%) were confirmed to carry a gene mutation reported to cause CJ (3). There was no statistically significant difference in gender, age, and feeding type among infants with CJ and impaired hepatic function (IHF) and healthy control (HC) infants. Blood tests showed elevated levels of BA (158.5 μmol/liter; IQR, 115.3, 213.5 μmol/liter), direct bilirubin (DB; 93.0 μmol/liter; IQR, 70.5, 123.7 μmol/liter), total bilirubin (TB; 163.1 μmol/liter; IQR, 120.2, 214.2 μmol/liter), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT; 149.0 U/liter; IQR, 99.5, 316.8 U/liter) in infants with CJ, and these were significantly higher than those in infants with IHF (Table 1). High levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 214.0 U/liter; IQR, 127.3, 349.0 U/liter) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST; 121.0 U/liter; IQR, 76.5, 233.8 U/liter) were also observed in infants with CJ, and the ALT level was significantly higher in infants with CJ than in subjects with IHF. Additionally, slightly lower levels of albumin (ALB) and hemoglobin (HB) were detected in infants with CJ than in subjects with IHF.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Characteristics of infants with CJ, IHF, and HCa

Fecal BA profiles are significantly altered in infants with CJ.We used a targeted metabolomics approach to evaluate the fecal BA profiles in the 95 individuals enrolled in this study, including 54 infants with CJ, 25 infants with IHF, and 16 HC infants. The levels of all primary BAs were decreased in infants with CJ, and these decreases were significant for allocholic acid (ACA), CA, CDCA, and α- and β-muricholic acid (α- and β-MCA) (Fig. 1). Reduced levels of most of the secondary BAs were found in infants with CJ, with the exceptions being α- and β-hyodeoxycholic acid (α- and β-HDCA) (Fig. 1). The patterns of decrease were also observed for the primary and secondary conjugated BAs in infants with CJ, although statistical significance was not reached. In order to evaluate the enzymatic processes in BA metabolism that may underlie the differences noted in infants with CJ, we investigated the two ratios (Table 2) reflective of enzymatic activities in the liver and the gut microbiome proposed previously (26). The CA/CDCA ratio was measured and was found to be significantly lower in infants with CJ, reflecting a shift in BA synthesis from the primary to the alternative BA pathway that occurs in the liver. The deoxycholic acid (DCA)/CA ratio was increased in infants with CJ, although the difference was not significant, indicating that the enhanced production of secondary BAs occurred in a proportion of infants with CJ.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Alteration of fecal bile acid metabolism in infantile cholestasis. The levels of primary and secondary bile acids in the cohort of infants with cholestatic jaundice (CJ) or impaired hepatic function (IHF) and the health controls (HC) were measured by tandem mass spectrometry. Significant differences were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ns, not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. HCA, hyocholic acid; 3_DHCA, 3-dehydrocholic acid; 7_DHCA, 7-dehydrocholic acid; KLCA, ketolithocholic acid; UCA, ursocholic acid; bUCA, β-ursocholic acid; muroCA, murocholic acid; NorCA, norcholic acid.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 2

Ratios of BAs reflective of liver and gut microbiome and enzymatic activitiesa

CJ is associated with gut microbiota dysbiosis.To investigate the changes in the gut microbiome, we performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on 126 fecal samples from infants with CJ (n = 56), infants with IHF (n = 25), and HC infants (n = 45). Alpha diversity, measured by the Shannon and Chao1 indexes, was significantly lower in infants with CJ than those with IHF and HC (Fig. 2A and B). Principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) of a Bray-Curtis distance matrix generated from genus-level taxa showed a separation between the microbiomes of infants with CJ and HC infants (Fig. 2C), whereas the samples from infants with IHF were not able to be distinguished from those of the infants in the other two groups.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Comparison of the taxonomic diversity of the gut microbiomes among the cholestatic jaundice (CJ), impaired hepatic function (IHF), and healthy control (HC) groups. The gut microbiota alpha diversity was measured from the Shannon (A) and Chao1 (B) indexes. The Wilcoxon test was performed for pairwise comparisons. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. (C) PCoA of Bray-Curtis distances generated from taxa summarized at the genus level. Each point corresponds to a sample shaped and colored by diagnosis.

We obtained 17 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with a significantly different abundance among the three groups (P < 0.05 by one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]; these OTUs consisted of taxa that had an abundance of greater than 0.1% across all samples and that occurred in at least 20% of the samples) (Fig. 3; see Table S1 in the supplemental material). CJ patients showed increased abundances of taxa assigned to the genera Clostridium sensu stricto (OTU2 and OTU46), Streptococcus (OTU13), and Veillonella (OTU40) and the family Enterobacteriaceae (OTU24) compared with the HC. Some taxa belonging to the genus Enterococcus (OTU68), Gemella (OTU45), and Streptococcus (OTU91) were more abundant in infants with IHF than in HC. The levels of potentially beneficial bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium (OTU96) and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (OTU151), were significantly decreased in infants with CJ. The levels of the taxon Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (OTU151) were also significantly reduced in children with IHF. In addition, the relative abundances of some taxa belonging to the genera Bacteroides, Blautia, Coprococcus, Eggerthella, and Flavonifractor and the Lachnospiraceae were also significantly reduced in infants with CJ compared with the HC.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Significant differences between the gut bacterial taxa of the cholestatic jaundice (CJ), impaired hepatic function (IHF), and healthy control (HC) groups. Comparisons among the groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; P < 0.05). The Wilcoxon test was performed for pairwise comparisons, *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. g, genus; s, species; f, family.

TABLE S1

OTUs with significantly different abundances among the cholestatic jaundice (CJ), impaired hepatic function (IHF), and healthy control (HC) groups. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 1.0 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Wang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

CJ-related gut microbiome functional alterations.BugBase software was applied to analyze the community-wide phenotypes of the stool microbiome. We observed that the proportion of aerobic bacteria was increased modestly in infants with IHF (Fig. 4A). The proportions of anaerobic bacteria (Fig. 4B) were significantly reduced and those of facultatively anaerobic bacteria (Fig. 4C) were enriched in infants with CJ. Bacterial function-associated oxidative stress tolerance (Fig. 4D) was found to be enriched in the CJ subjects. Gram-negative bacteria (Fig. 4E) were decreased and Gram-positive bacteria (Fig. 4F) were greatly increased in infants with IHF in comparison with their levels in HC and CJ subjects. In addition, the bacterial function-associated mobile element content (Fig. 4G), biofilm formation (Fig. 4H), and pathogenesis (Fig. 4I) were found to the enriched in the CJ subjects. These findings were mainly attributed to the proteobacteria (most likely the Enterobacteriaceae family).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Discrepancy in microbial community phenotypes between the cholestatic jaundice (CJ) group and the other two groups. BugBase identified phenotypes associated with aerobic bacteria (A), anaerobic bacteria (B), facultatively anaerobic bacteria (C), oxidative stress tolerance (D), Gram-negative bacteria (E), Gram-positive bacteria (F), mobile element content (G), biofilm formation (H), and pathogenesis (I). Statistical significance was identified by the Wilcoxon test with false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected pairwise P values. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

PICRUSt (Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States) software was used to predict the relative abundance of KEGG functions, which were compared between children with CJ and IHF and the HC. We found that bacterial transporters were increased in children with altered liver function (both infants with CJ and infants with IHF) compared to the HC subjects (Fig. 5). In addition, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters were particularly more abundant in CJ subjects than in the HC.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Functional alterations of the gut microbiome in infants with cholestatic jaundice (CJ) and impaired hepatic function (IHF). Statistical significance was determined by using LEfSe, with a P value of <0.05 (Wilcoxon test) and a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score (log10) of >3 being considered significant.

Covariance between serum BAs, fecal BAs, and the gut microbiome.To examine the relationship between members of the gut microbiota and BAs, we calculated Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient for the 17 OTUs (those that were significantly changed in infants with CJ and/or IHF), serological indexes, and fecal BAs. We performed unsupervised clustering of OTUs, serological parameters, and fecal BAs, which revealed four distinct OTU clusters (clusters O1 to O4; Fig. 6A) and a clear separation of fecal BAs and serological indexes. OTUs in the first cluster, cluster O1 (which included taxa assigned to the genera Clostridium sensu stricto, Veillonella, and Streptococcus and the family Enterobacteriaceae), were positively and negatively correlated with the levels of serum BAs (and most of the serological indexes) and fecal BAs, respectively. In contrast, the OTUs in cluster O4 (which included the taxa Blautia, Eggerthella, Faecalibacterium, Flavonifractor, Lachnospiraceae incertae sedis, and Ruminococcus) were negatively and positively correlated with the levels of serum BAs and fecal BAs, respectively. Notably, clusters O1 and O4 were positively and negatively correlated with the ratio of secondary/primary BAs (DCA/CA), respectively.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Correlation matrices constructed from gut bacterial taxa, fecal BAs, and serum indicators of hepatic function. Spearman correlation analysis between fecal BA serum indicators of hepatic function and the top 17 OTUs with significantly different abundances among the groups (A) and the gut microbiota functional categories (B) was employed. Four distinct OTU clusters (clusters O1 to O4) and two distinct functional clusters (clusters F1 and F2) were observed. Red and blue represent the positive and negative correlations, respectively. GHDCA, glycohyodeoxycholic acid; TCA, taurocholic acid; GCA, glycocholic acid; LCA, lithocholic acid; GLCA, glycolithocholic acid; THDCA, taurohyodeoxycholic acid; TLCA-3S, taurolithocholic acid-3-sulfate acid; GCDCA, glycochenodeoxycholic acid; GHCA, glycohyocholic acid; TUDCA, tauroursodeoxycholic acid; GDCA, glycodeoxycholic acid; THCA, taurohyocholic acid; TDCA, taurodeoxycholic acid; GUDCA, glycoursodeoxycholic acid; ALB, albumin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BA, bile acid; DB, direct bilirubin; HB, hemoglobin; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; TB, total bilirubin.

The associations between the functional profiles of the gut microbiota and hepatic function and fecal BAs were also investigated. Two distinct functional clusters (clusters F1 and F2) resulted from applying Spearman correlations between the PICRUSt-predicted KEGG pathways representative of each group (linear discriminant analysis [LDA] score > 3, P < 0.05), serological indexes, and fecal BAs (Fig. 6B). The KEGG pathways in cluster F1, which included components related to other ion-coupled transporters, the phosphotransferase system, the secretion system, transcription factors, transporters, ABC transporters, and two-component systems, were found to be positively associated with most serological indexes and inversely associated with the fecal levels of BAs, which were stronger for primary and secondary BAs than for their conjugated components. The KEGG pathways in cluster F2, which included alanine aspartate and glutamate metabolism, DNA replication proteins, DNA repair and recombination proteins, other glycan degradation, purine metabolism, pyrimidine metabolism, ribosome, and transcription machinery, were negatively and positively correlated with serum BAs (as well as other serological indexes of liver functions) and fecal BAs, respectively. The levels of KEGG pathways in cluster F1 were found to be positively and negatively correlated with DCA/CA and CDCA/CA, respectively, whereas the functions of cluster F2 showed the opposite trend of correlations.

DISCUSSION

The primary BAs are synthesized in the liver through two pathways, namely, the classical (neutral) and the alternative (acidic) pathways. The classical BA synthetic pathway produces about 90% of total BAs, composed of CA and CDCA in approximately equal amounts. In contrast to the classical pathway, the alternative pathway produces only CDCA (6). Alterations in BA synthesis and composition are important factors that modulate hepatotoxicity in chronic liver diseases. Liver health, fecal BA concentrations, and the gut microbiota composition are closely connected (22). BAs and the microbiome influence each other in the gut, where bacteria modify the BA profile, while intestinal BAs regulate the growth of commensal bacteria, maintain barrier integrity, and modulate the immune system (22). An inborn error of BA synthesis can produce abnormal BA metabolites, which can lead to cholestatic liver disease in infancy and progressive neurological disease in childhood and into adulthood (27, 28). In this study, we demonstrated the association between the changes of the gut microbiome and BA metabolism and estimated the potential impact on host physiology in infant CJ patients. We observed reduced levels of the primary BAs and most of the secondary BAs in stool samples from infants with CJ, a finding which is consistent with the typical symptoms of cholestasis. Infants with CJ showed a decreased fecal CA/CDCA ratio, indicating that the classic pathway was impaired, while the alternative one was preserved. In addition, an increase in the ratio of secondary to primary BAs (DCA/CA) was observed in infants with CJ, which may suggest altered activity of bacterial 7α-dehydroxylases, leading to an excess production of secondary BAs, many of which are cytotoxic to the liver. Actually, the concentrations of two secondary BAs, α- and β-HDCA, were found to be increased in infants with CJ compared with the HC and infants with IHF.

We demonstrated that the CJ-associated gut microbiota dysbiosis was characterized by a decreased biodiversity, a decrease in the microbiota with a beneficial potential (the genera Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium), and an overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacteria (the Enterobacteriaceae family). Species of the genus Bifidobacterium are believed to confer beneficial effects upon their host, and their high abundance in the infant gut indicates saccharolytic activity toward glycans. Bifidobacterium appears to influence short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, either directly, by modulating the synthesis of SCFAs, such as acetate and formate (29), or indirectly, by altering the gut microbiota composition and/or microbiome-microbiome interactions (30). In addition, species of the genus Bifidobacterium also contribute to maintaining the normal function of the gut mucosa and protect the mucosa from injurious factors, such as allergens, pathogens, and toxins (31). The genus Faecalibacterium, which comprises the sole known species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, consists of well-established protective bacteria with the capacity to reinforce the barrier integrity of epidermal cells and repress inflammation through the production of SCFAs (32, 33). Thus, declines in the abundances of Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii may evoke and enhance systemic inflammation in the host. A member of the family Enterobacteriaceae was significantly enriched in the gut microbiota of CJ infants, resulting in an increased level of bacterial gene contents with pathogenic potential, and its abundance was positively correlated with serum indicators of liver damage. Additionally, lower abundances of Lachnospiraceae and Blautia were detected in infants with CJ, which is similar to the findings for patients with cirrhosis (21, 22).

The known gut bacteria capable of processing 7α-dehydroxylases are the species of Clostridium (such as Clostridium hiranonis, C. hylemonae, C. scindens, and C. sordellii) (15). Due to a lack of redundancy in this system, any perturbations to the 7α-dehydroxylating bacteria are likely to induce an imbalance in the ratio between secondary and primary BAs and impact hepatic function. Although two taxa of Clostridium were found to be enriched in the infants with CJ, their identification to the species level could not be accurately determined based on the sequences of the 16S rRNA V3-V4 regions. Thus, further investigations of the microbiome profile with shotgun metagenomic sequencing are needed to identify the exact species that shift 7α-dehydroxylation during cholestasis.

Functional analysis of the bacterial communities in the infants with CJ revealed the enhanced expression of ABC transporters. In the host system, ABC transporters serve as an important cytoprotective mechanism by eliminating toxins and drugs out of cells, thereby protecting the hepatocyte from toxicity due to BA overaccumulation. Bacterial ABC transporters are also able to protect the microorganisms from xenobiotic pressure (34). The apparent upregulation of ABC transporters and other ion-coupled transporters might implicate an enhanced antimicrobial pressure in the gut environment.

In summary, infantile CJ is associated with a significant dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, which is featured by a general decline in bacteria with beneficial potential as well as those capable of processing the necessary enzymes to convert primary to secondary BAs and an enrichment of potentially pathogenic taxa. These changes in the gut microbiota might modulate the composition of BAs, disrupt the gut barrier integrity, and provoke and enhance inflammation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study cohort.A total of 126 infants from Shanghai Children’s Hospital, Shanghai, China, were recruited to the study cohort between September 2016 and March 2019 (Table 1). The diagnosis of CJ in the infants was based on the guidelines described elsewhere (1, 3). An abnormal direct bilirubin (DB) level was defined as a value greater than 17 μmol/liter if the total bilirubin (TB) level was less than 85 μmol/liter or a value of DB that represented more than 20% of that of TB if the TB level was greater than 85 μmol/liter (1). Serological tests for liver function were performed. Levels of BA, DB, TB, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and albumin (ALB) were measured by using an AU5800 clinical chemistry analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Hemoglobin (HB) was measured by use of a sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) hemoglobin test (Sysmex XN-1000 automatic hematology analyzer; Sysmex Corporation). Twenty-five infants with normal levels of DB and TB but with elevated AST and ALT levels were enrolled in the study as controls and were termed the impaired hepatic function (IHF) group. Forty-five healthy infants without any history of chronic diseases were enrolled as healthy controls (HC). None of the healthy individuals had clinically relevant CJ or any symptoms at the time of fecal collection, and subjects who took antibiotics within 2 months before fecal collection or who had any inflammatory conditions were excluded from the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of the infants eligible for study enrollment. This study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Boards of Shanghai Children’s Hospital and carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964 and later versions.

Quantification of fecal BAs.Targeted metabolomics profiling was performed to measure the concentrations of 43 BAs in fecal samples according to previously reported methods (35). In brief, each accurately weighed lyophilized fecal sample (∼10 mg) was homogenized with 50 μl of water using a Bullet Blender tissue homogenizer (Next Advance, Inc., Averill Park, NY). An aliquot of 150 μl of acetonitrile containing 9 internal standards was added, and the extraction was performed using the homogenizer. After centrifugation, 50 μl of each supernatant was transferred to a 96-well plate and diluted with 150 μl of a mobile phase mixture (mobile phase B-mobile phase A [50:50, vol/vol]). The injection volume was 5 μl. After centrifugation, 5 μl supernatant was used for measurement by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis (LC-TQMS). An Acquity ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) coupled with a Xevo TQ-S mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) was used to quantitate the BAs. MassLynx software (version 4.1; Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) was used for instrument control and data processing. Chromatographic separation was achieved with a Waters BEH C18 column (particle size, 1.7 μm; 2.1 mm by 100 mm [internal dimensions]). The UPLC-mass spectrometry (MS) raw data were acquired in negative mode and were processed using the TargetLynx application manager (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) to obtain calibration equations and the measured concentration of each bile acid in the samples.

Fecal microbiome analysis.Stool samples were collected with sterile swabs by nursing staff at Shanghai Children’s Hospital and stored at −80°C. Genomic DNA extraction, PCR amplification, library preparation, and Illumina sequencing were conducted according to a protocol described previously (36). In brief, total microbial DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA stool minikit (Qiagen, Germany). The extracted genomic DNA was PCR amplified with barcoded primers (forward primer, 5′-CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC AG-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GGA CTA CHV GGG TWT CTA AT-3′) targeting the 16S rRNA V3-V4 region. Water samples that had undergone the same procedures of DNA extraction and PCR amplification were used as a control. An equal amount of DNA from each sample was pooled and verified using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent, USA). Sequencing was performed using an Illumina MiSeq platform at HRK Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, China).

A total of 8,265,997 raw sequence reads were produced from 126 stool samples. The paired reads were merged. The average number of reads per sample was 65,603 ± 23,222. The average length after joining of the reads was 462 ± 8 bp per sample. Data processing was performed by using the USEARCH (version 10.0.240) program (37) with an open-source bioinformatics pipeline described at http://www.drive5.com/usearch. The depth of the sequencing data used for analysis was 10,000 reads per sample, based on the findings of the rarefaction analysis (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). We applied the Unoise error correction (denoising) algorithm to reconstruct a set of correct biological sequences in the reads and generate zero-radius operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (38). Taxonomic assignment was performed by using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) classifier. Statistical analysis was performed with the Calypso web server (39). The alpha diversity of the fecal microbiome was measured by use of the Shannon and Chao1 indexes. The overall differences in microbiome structure were evaluated through principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) of a Bray-Curtis distance. BugBase was applied to predict the organism-level microbiome phenotypes (40). The KEGG ortholog functional profiles of the microbial communities were predicted by PICRUSt (Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States) software (41). The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size method (LEfSe) was applied to determine the PICRUSt-predicted functions that were enriched in the different groups. The differences in the relative abundances of the taxa and the concentrations of BAs among the groups were assessed for statistical significance by one-way ANOVA followed by Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons. The Spearman correlation was applied to investigate the associations between serological indexes, fecal BAs, and the composition and functions of the gut microbiome.

FIG S1

Rarefaction analysis of the 16S rRNA genes in the fecal microbiome. Rarefaction plots of all 126 samples show the number of observed OTUs reaching the asymptote at the cutoff of 10,000 reads. Each sample is represented by a different color in the graph. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 1.0 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Wang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Statistical analysis.Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS (version 20.0) software. The data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR; 25th to 75th percentiles) and compared by use of the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test (for two groups) or the Kruskal-Wallis H test (for multiple groups). The distribution of dichotomous variables was compared by the chi-squared test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Data availability.Raw metabolomic data for the bile acids are available in the Metabolights metabolomics repository under study accession number MTBLS1295. Raw sequencing data are available in the European Nucleotide Archive server under study accession number PRJEB33641.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81870373 and 81500449), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (grant number 16ZR1428700), the Shanghai Hospital Development Center New Frontier Technology Joint Research Project (grant number SHDC12017115), and the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning Key Project (grant number 2017ZZ02019).

We declare no conflicts interest.

Y.W. and T.Z. designed the study. X.Z., Y.X., X.L., H.H., and T.G. analyzed and interpreted the clinical data. Y.W., X.G., J.H., and D.Y. performed the bioinformatic and statistical analyses. D.L. contributed to fecal sample collection. Y.W. and X.G. created the figures and wrote the manuscript, and T.Z. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received July 30, 2019.
    • Accepted October 9, 2019.
  • Copyright © 2019 Wang et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Moyer V,
    2. Freese DK,
    3. Whitington PF,
    4. Olson AD,
    5. Brewer F,
    6. Colletti RB,
    7. Heyman MB
    . 2004. Guideline for the evaluation of cholestatic jaundice in infants: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 39:115–128. doi:10.1097/00005176-200408000-00001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Dick MC,
    2. Mowat AP
    . 1985. Hepatitis syndrome in infancy—an epidemiological survey with 10 year follow up. Arch Dis Child 60:512–516. doi:10.1136/adc.60.6.512.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Fawaz R,
    2. Baumann U,
    3. Ekong U,
    4. Fischler B,
    5. Hadzic N,
    6. Mack CL,
    7. McLin VA,
    8. Molleston JP,
    9. Neimark E,
    10. Ng VL,
    11. Karpen SJ
    . 2017. Guideline for the evaluation of cholestatic jaundice in infants: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 64:154–168. doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000001334.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Karpen SJ
    . 2002. Update on the etiologies and management of neonatal cholestasis. Clin Perinatol 29:159–180. doi:10.1016/S0095-5108(03)00069-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ananth R
    . 2018. Neonatal cholestasis: a primer of selected etiologies. Pediatr Ann 47:e433–e439. doi:10.3928/19382359-20181018-01.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Boyer JL
    . 2013. Bile formation and secretion. Compr Physiol 3:1035–1078. doi:10.1002/cphy.c120027.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. de Aguiar Vallim TQ,
    2. Tarling EJ,
    3. Edwards PA
    . 2013. Pleiotropic roles of bile acids in metabolism. Cell Metab 17:657–669. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2013.03.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Maillette de Buy Wenniger L,
    2. Beuers U
    . 2010. Bile salts and cholestasis. Dig Liver Dis 42:409–418. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2010.03.015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Chiang JY
    . 2013. Bile acid metabolism and signaling. Compr Physiol 3:1191–1212. doi:10.1002/cphy.c120023.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wahlstrom A,
    2. Sayin SI,
    3. Marschall HU,
    4. Backhed F
    . 2016. Intestinal crosstalk between bile acids and microbiota and its impact on host metabolism. Cell Metab 24:41–50. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Human Microbiome Project Consortium. 2012. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486:207–214. doi:10.1038/nature11234.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ridlon JM,
    2. Kang DJ,
    3. Hylemon PB,
    4. Bajaj JS
    . 2014. Bile acids and the gut microbiome. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 30:332–338. doi:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000057.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Sayin SI,
    2. Wahlstrom A,
    3. Felin J,
    4. Jantti S,
    5. Marschall HU,
    6. Bamberg K,
    7. Angelin B,
    8. Hyotylainen T,
    9. Oresic M,
    10. Backhed F
    . 2013. Gut microbiota regulates bile acid metabolism by reducing the levels of tauro-beta-muricholic acid, a naturally occurring FXR antagonist. Cell Metab 17:225–235. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2013.01.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Begley M,
    2. Gahan CG,
    3. Hill C
    . 2005. The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:625–651. doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.09.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ridlon JM,
    2. Kang DJ,
    3. Hylemon PB
    . 2006. Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. J Lipid Res 47:241–259. doi:10.1194/jlr.R500013-JLR200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Inagaki T,
    2. Moschetta A,
    3. Lee YK,
    4. Peng L,
    5. Zhao G,
    6. Downes M,
    7. Yu RT,
    8. Shelton JM,
    9. Richardson JA,
    10. Repa JJ,
    11. Mangelsdorf DJ,
    12. Kliewer SA
    . 2006. Regulation of antibacterial defense in the small intestine by the nuclear bile acid receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:3920–3925. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509592103.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Boursier J,
    2. Mueller O,
    3. Barret M,
    4. Machado M,
    5. Fizanne L,
    6. Araujo-Perez F,
    7. Guy CD,
    8. Seed PC,
    9. Rawls JF,
    10. David LA,
    11. Hunault G,
    12. Oberti F,
    13. Calès P,
    14. Diehl AM
    . 2016. The severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with gut dysbiosis and shift in the metabolic function of the gut microbiota. Hepatology 63:764–775. doi:10.1002/hep.28356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Caussy C,
    2. Loomba R
    . 2018. Gut microbiome, microbial metabolites and the development of NAFLD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 15:719–720. doi:10.1038/s41575-018-0058-x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lv LX,
    2. Fang DQ,
    3. Shi D,
    4. Chen DY,
    5. Yan R,
    6. Zhu YX,
    7. Chen YF,
    8. Shao L,
    9. Guo FF,
    10. Wu WR,
    11. Li A,
    12. Shi HY,
    13. Jiang XW,
    14. Jiang HY,
    15. Xiao YH,
    16. Zheng SS,
    17. Li LJ
    . 2016. Alterations and correlations of the gut microbiome, metabolism and immunity in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Environ Microbiol 18:2272–2286. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Sabino J,
    2. Vieira-Silva S,
    3. Machiels K,
    4. Joossens M,
    5. Falony G,
    6. Ballet V,
    7. Ferrante M,
    8. Van Assche G,
    9. Van der Merwe S,
    10. Vermeire S,
    11. Raes J
    . 2016. Primary sclerosing cholangitis is characterised by intestinal dysbiosis independent from IBD. Gut 65:1681–1689. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Yang F,
    3. Lu H,
    4. Wang B,
    5. Chen Y,
    6. Lei D,
    7. Wang Y,
    8. Zhu B,
    9. Li L
    . 2011. Characterization of fecal microbial communities in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatology 54:562–572. doi:10.1002/hep.24423.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kakiyama G,
    2. Pandak WM,
    3. Gillevet PM,
    4. Hylemon PB,
    5. Heuman DM,
    6. Daita K,
    7. Takei H,
    8. Muto A,
    9. Nittono H,
    10. Ridlon JM,
    11. White MB,
    12. Noble NA,
    13. Monteith P,
    14. Fuchs M,
    15. Thacker LR,
    16. Sikaroodi M,
    17. Bajaj JS
    . 2013. Modulation of the fecal bile acid profile by gut microbiota in cirrhosis. J Hepatol 58:949–955. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2013.01.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Bajaj JS,
    2. Hylemon PB,
    3. Ridlon JM,
    4. Heuman DM,
    5. Daita K,
    6. White MB,
    7. Monteith P,
    8. Noble NA,
    9. Sikaroodi M,
    10. Gillevet PM
    . 2012. Colonic mucosal microbiome differs from stool microbiome in cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy and is linked to cognition and inflammation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 303:G675–G685. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00152.2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Bajaj JS,
    2. Heuman DM,
    3. Hylemon PB,
    4. Sanyal AJ,
    5. White MB,
    6. Monteith P,
    7. Noble NA,
    8. Unser AB,
    9. Daita K,
    10. Fisher AR,
    11. Sikaroodi M,
    12. Gillevet PM
    . 2014. Altered profile of human gut microbiome is associated with cirrhosis and its complications. J Hepatol 60:940–947. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2013.12.019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Qin N,
    2. Yang F,
    3. Li A,
    4. Prifti E,
    5. Chen Y,
    6. Shao L,
    7. Guo J,
    8. Le Chatelier E,
    9. Yao J,
    10. Wu L,
    11. Zhou J,
    12. Ni S,
    13. Liu L,
    14. Pons N,
    15. Batto JM,
    16. Kennedy SP,
    17. Leonard P,
    18. Yuan C,
    19. Ding W,
    20. Chen Y,
    21. Hu X,
    22. Zheng B,
    23. Qian G,
    24. Xu W,
    25. Ehrlich SD,
    26. Zheng S,
    27. Li L
    . 2014. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis. Nature 513:59–64. doi:10.1038/nature13568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. MahmoudianDehkordi S,
    2. Arnold M,
    3. Nho K,
    4. Ahmad S,
    5. Jia W,
    6. Xie G,
    7. Louie G,
    8. Kueider-Paisley A,
    9. Moseley MA,
    10. Thompson JW,
    11. St John Williams L,
    12. Tenenbaum JD,
    13. Blach C,
    14. Baillie R,
    15. Han X,
    16. Bhattacharyya S,
    17. Toledo JB,
    18. Schafferer S,
    19. Klein S,
    20. Koal T,
    21. Risacher SL,
    22. Kling MA,
    23. Motsinger-Reif A,
    24. Rotroff DM,
    25. Jack J,
    26. Hankemeier T,
    27. Bennett DA,
    28. De Jager PL,
    29. Trojanowski JQ,
    30. Shaw LM,
    31. Weiner MW,
    32. Doraiswamy PM,
    33. van Duijn CM,
    34. Saykin AJ,
    35. Kastenmüller G,
    36. Kaddurah-Daouk R
    . 2019. Altered bile acid profile associates with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease—an emerging role for gut microbiome. Alzheimers Dement 15:76–92. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.217.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Chen H-L,
    2. Wu S-H,
    3. Hsu S-H,
    4. Liou B-Y,
    5. Chen H-L,
    6. Chang M-H
    . 2018. Jaundice revisited: recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of inherited cholestatic liver diseases. J Biomed Sci 25:75. doi:10.1186/s12929-018-0475-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Stelten BML,
    2. van de Warrenburg BPC,
    3. Wevers RA,
    4. Verrips A
    . 2019. Movement disorders in cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 58:12–16. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.07.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Macfarlane S,
    2. Macfarlane GT
    . 2003. Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. Proc Nutr Soc 62:67–72. doi:10.1079/PNS2002207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Turroni F,
    2. Milani C,
    3. Duranti S,
    4. Mancabelli L,
    5. Mangifesta M,
    6. Viappiani A,
    7. Lugli GA,
    8. Ferrario C,
    9. Gioiosa L,
    10. Ferrarini A,
    11. Li J,
    12. Palanza P,
    13. Delledonne M,
    14. van Sinderen D,
    15. Ventura M
    . 2016. Deciphering bifidobacterial-mediated metabolic interactions and their impact on gut microbiota by a multi-omics approach. ISME J 10:1656–1668. doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Rao RK,
    2. Samak G
    . 2013. Protection and restitution of gut barrier by probiotics: nutritional and clinical implications. Curr Nutr Food Sci 9:99–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Miquel S,
    2. Martin R,
    3. Rossi O,
    4. Bermudez-Humaran LG,
    5. Chatel JM,
    6. Sokol H,
    7. Thomas M,
    8. Wells JM,
    9. Langella P
    . 2013. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and human intestinal health. Curr Opin Microbiol 16:255–261. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2013.06.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Odenwald MA,
    2. Turner JR
    . 2017. The intestinal epithelial barrier: a therapeutic target? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:9–21. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2016.169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Fath MJ,
    2. Kolter R
    . 1993. ABC transporters: bacterial exporters. Microbiol Rev 57:995–1017.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Xie G,
    2. Zhong W,
    3. Li H,
    4. Li Q,
    5. Qiu Y,
    6. Zheng X,
    7. Chen H,
    8. Zhao X,
    9. Zhang S,
    10. Zhou Z,
    11. Zeisel SH,
    12. Jia W
    . 2013. Alteration of bile acid metabolism in the rat induced by chronic ethanol consumption. FASEB J 27:3583–3593. doi:10.1096/fj.13-231860.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Gao X,
    3. Ghozlane A,
    4. Hu H,
    5. Li X,
    6. Xiao Y,
    7. Li D,
    8. Yu G,
    9. Zhang T
    . 2018. Characteristics of faecal microbiota in paediatric Crohn’s disease and their dynamic changes during infliximab therapy. J Crohns Colitis 12:337–346. doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx153.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    1. Edgar RC
    . 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Edgar RC
    . 2016. UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/081257.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    1. Zakrzewski M,
    2. Proietti C,
    3. Ellis JJ,
    4. Hasan S,
    5. Brion MJ,
    6. Berger B,
    7. Krause L
    . 2017. Calypso: a user-friendly web-server for mining and visualizing microbiome-environment interactions. Bioinformatics 33:782–783. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw725.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Ward T,
    2. Larson J,
    3. Meulemans J,
    4. Hillmann B,
    5. Lynch J,
    6. Sidiropoulos D,
    7. Spear J,
    8. Caporaso G,
    9. Blekhman R,
    10. Knight R,
    11. Fink R,
    12. Knights D
    . 2017. BugBase predicts organism level microbiome phenotypes. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/133462.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Langille MG,
    2. Zaneveld J,
    3. Caporaso JG,
    4. McDonald D,
    5. Knights D,
    6. Reyes JA,
    7. Clemente JC,
    8. Burkepile DE,
    9. Vega Thurber RL,
    10. Knight R,
    11. Beiko RG,
    12. Huttenhower C
    . 2013. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31:814–821. doi:10.1038/nbt.2676.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Is Associated with Altered Bile Acid Metabolism in Infantile Cholestasis
Yizhong Wang, Xuefeng Gao, Xinyue Zhang, Yongmei Xiao, Jiandong Huang, Dongbao Yu, Xiaolu Li, Hui Hu, Ting Ge, Dan Li, Ting Zhang
mSystems Dec 2019, 4 (6) e00463-19; DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00463-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSystems article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Is Associated with Altered Bile Acid Metabolism in Infantile Cholestasis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSystems
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSystems.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Is Associated with Altered Bile Acid Metabolism in Infantile Cholestasis
Yizhong Wang, Xuefeng Gao, Xinyue Zhang, Yongmei Xiao, Jiandong Huang, Dongbao Yu, Xiaolu Li, Hui Hu, Ting Ge, Dan Li, Ting Zhang
mSystems Dec 2019, 4 (6) e00463-19; DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00463-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

bile acids
cholestatic jaundice
dysbiosis
gut microbiota
infants

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSystems
  • Author Videos
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • Overleaf Pilot
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSystemsJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5077