Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Editor's Picks
    • Special Series: Sponsored Minireviews and Video Abstracts
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Novel Systems Biology Techniques
    • Early-Career Systems Microbiology Perspectives
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About mSystems
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSystems
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Editor's Picks
    • Special Series: Sponsored Minireviews and Video Abstracts
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Novel Systems Biology Techniques
    • Early-Career Systems Microbiology Perspectives
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About mSystems
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Special Issue Perspective | Novel Systems Biology Techniques

Strengthening Insights in Microbial Ecological Networks from Theory to Applications

Xiaofei Lv, Kankan Zhao, Ran Xue, Yuanhui Liu, Jianming Xu, Bin Ma
Xiaofei Lv
aDepartment of Environmental Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China
bInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kankan Zhao
bInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ran Xue
bInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuanhui Liu
bInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianming Xu
bInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bin Ma
bInstitute of Soil and Water Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00124-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Networks encode the interactions between the components in complex systems and play an essential role in understanding complex systems. Microbial ecological networks provide a system-level insight for comprehensively understanding complex microbial interactions, which play important roles in microbial community assembly. However, microbial ecological networks are in their infancy of both network inference and biological interpretation. In this perspective, we articulate the theory gaps and limitations in building and interpreting microbial ecological networks, emphasize developing tools for evaluating the predicted microbial interaction relationships, and predict the potential applications of microbial ecological networks in the long run.

mSystems® vol. 4, no. 3, is a special issue sponsored by Illumina.

PERSPECTIVE

The term “complex system” represents a system whose collective behavior is difficult to derive from a knowledge of the system’s components, such as the cooperation between billions of individuals in human society (1), the links between countless webpages of the Internet (2), or the interactions between thousands of genes within cells (3). Given the important role complex systems play in every aspect of the world, it is one of the major scientific challenges in understanding, describing, predicting, and controlling complex systems (4). Network science emerging from the dawn of the 21st century has been resolving this challenge by constructing an intricate network to encode the interactions between a system’s components. For instance, social networks determine the spread of knowledge, behaviors, and resources, communication networks are at the heart of modern communication systems, and gene, protein, and metabolic networks are prerequisites of life. Accordingly, A.-L. Barabási, the bellwether of the network science, claimed that “we will never understand complex systems unless we develop a deep understanding of the networks behind them” (4).

Microbial communities are also complex systems. Microorganisms form complex ecological interactions, including win-win relationships such as mutual cross-feeding and cooperation interactions, win-lose relationships such as predator-prey and host-parasite interactions, and loss-loss relationship such as competitive exclusion interactions (5). These microbial interactions are known to be critical properties of microbial communities and play important roles in microbial community assembly. Reconstruction of microbial ecological networks representing these interactions can advance our understanding of the complex behaviors in microbial communities, predict the effects of perturbations on community dynamics, and help with the engineering of complex microbial communities (6).

Although the potential value of inferring and interpreting microbial interaction networks has been known, inference and interpretation of microbial interaction networks are far from straightforward. In this perspective, we consider the gaps in theory and limitations in measuring microbial interactions, identifying indirect edges, understanding biological implications, and describing network evolution (Fig. 1). Additionally, we look ahead to the applications of microfluidics, high-throughput culturing methods, and verified interaction databases for evaluating the predicted microbial interaction relationships. Finally, we predict the potential applications of microbial ecological networks in detecting microbial dark matter and regulating microbial community functions.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Microbial ecological networks are considered to represent the relationships of complex microbial communities. However, there are still some gaps in theory and limitations in network inference and interpretation, such as selecting the statistical method, eliminating indirect edges, describing ecological implications description, and reviving work on network evolution. Hence, we need to evaluate the predicted interaction relationships through developing tools like lab-on-chip technologies and public verified interaction databases. Ultimately, it could be used to detect microbial dark matter and regulate microbial community functions.

FILLING IN THE THEORY GAPS IN NETWORK INFERENCE AND INTERPRETATION

A network is a catalog of a system’s components often called nodes or vertices and the interactions between them, called links or edges. For microbial ecological networks, nodes represent microbial taxa or environmental factors, and edges represent potential microbial interactions inferred from statistically significant similarities. There are different toolkits and pipelines using a range of different statistical measure methods, including Pearson and Spearman correlation, inverse covariance, Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, and maximal information (5). Given that statistical measure methods differ in their strengths and weaknesses, it is not straightforward to determine the most appropriate model. The method chosen has a large impact on the association patterns in the resulting networks. Weiss et al. (7) found that networks inferred with different approaches shared less than a third of edges. Additionally, edge directions in microbial ecological networks have critical implications in understanding ecological processes. Although most of the methods based on cross-sectional data are unable to infer directed network, directed edges can be generated from time series data or Lotka-Volterra dynamics (6). Hence, criteria for statistical measure selection based on experimental designs and data set characteristics will increase accuracy and facilitate network interpretation. A set of simulated data sets with definite interaction relationships could be useful for evaluating network inferring methods (6).

The final inferred microbial networks generally contain spurious indirect edges. If two species cooccur with an unreported factor, such as undetected microbial species and abiotic drivers, they may acquire an indirect edge from covariance because they are both affected by the same factor. Although correlation-based tools have not removed indirect edges, two papers published in 2013 introduced two different methods for recognizing indirect edges in correlation-based networks. Feizi et al. (8) introduced a deconvolution algorithm for inferring direct effects from a correlation matrix containing both direct and indirect effects. At the same time, Barzel and Barabási (9) developed a method to silence indirect effects in correlation-based network. However, the performance of these two methods has not been evaluated for microbial ecological networks. Lima-Mendez et al. (10) proposed a method for detecting indirect edges by checking the association patterns in environmental triplet of taxon-environment networks. This method detects indirect edges with the assistance of environmental variables, but it is impossible to use all the environmental factors in the systems.

The edges in networks for social interactions, Internet links, and protein or gene interactions are defined definitely and clearly. Accordingly, the topological properties of these networks can be clearly interpreted. However, the implications of topological properties of microbial ecological networks, such as modularity, transitivity, and assortativity, are unclear because the edges of microbial ecological networks are defined ambiguously (6). Moreover, correlation-based microbial ecological networks cannot infer amensalism and commensalism and differentiate mutualism and competition.

In reality, microbial communities are dynamic; hence, microbial ecological networks are evolving during community assembly processes. Mathematically describing evolving networks allows us to address the impacts of various processes on network topology and evolution (4). Although time series data sets have been used for inferring networks, those studies highlighted determining the directions of edges, rather than determining the evolution of networks (11).

EVALUATING THE PREDICTED INTERACTIONS

At present, one of the defects in most of the microbial interaction network studies is that the interaction relationships in the inferred microbial interaction network lack further evaluations. Coculture experiments could provide substantial evidence for evaluating the relationships in the microbial interaction networks. However, coculture experiments in petri dishes cannot represent the complexity of the microbial interaction networks. Lab-on-chip technologies might provide a solution for screening coculture features on a large scale. Moreover, given that more than 99% of microbial species in natural environments are uncultured and unknown to us, microbial dark matter will hamper our understanding of the microbial interaction networks. On one hand, advances in culture-independent methods, such as metagenomics and single-cell sequencing (12), will provide necessary information of microbial dark matter in interpreting and evaluating the interaction relationships in the microbial interaction network. On the other hand, emerging high-throughput culturing methods, such as iChip and culturomics (13), could greatly expand the numbers of culturable microbial strains to foster coculture evaluations.

It is almost impossible to experimentally evaluate all the microbial interaction relationships in an inferred microbial ecological network in a single study. Lima-Mendez et al. (10) evaluated the predicted interactions with a list of known symbiotic interactions sensu lato built through screening the literature by a panel of four experts. Public biological databases, which began in the early 1980s when DNA sequence data began to accumulate in the scientific literature, have been playing critical roles in promoting the rapid development of biology. The molecular life sciences have been increasingly driven by and reliant on these open-access public databases, such as the EMBL-EBI’s ENA, the NCBI’s GenBank, and NIG’s DDBJ. Accordingly, we suggest that creating a public database for archiving microbial interaction relationships could bridge the gaps between inferring microbial ecology networks and evaluations of the networks and advocate understanding microbial ecology networks.

HARNESSING MICROBIAL FUNCTIONS WITH MICROBIAL ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS

Lacking interactions with cooccurring microorganisms from in situ environments is one of the reasons that most microbial strains failed to be cultured in labs. Identifying cooccurring species of interesting uncultured microbial species in microbial ecological networks might help to create the necessary growth environments for uncultured microbial species. Theoretically, uncultured microbial species have the chance to be cultured when they grow together with their mutualistic, syntrophic, or parasitic partners. For mutualistic relationship, either cultured microorganisms could increase the fitness of their uncultured mutualistic partner. For syntrophic relationship, only uncultured species that depend on the nutrients, growth factors, or substrates provided by the other cultured partners have the potential to be isolated. For parasitic relationship, a cultured microbial host could help to enrich uncultured parasites. Moreover, if a predation relationship is obligate, a cultured microbial prey could help to enrich uncultured predators as well. Other interaction relationships such as competition, amensalism, and commensalism do not have the facilities for promoting microbial dark matter detection.

The small-world property of network induces that any two members in microbial community could interact with each other through a few intermediaries. Liu et al. (14) investigated the controllability of networks and demonstrated that many real-world networks could be controlled through a small number of vertices. Regulating the functions of microbial communities is one of the core objects of microbial ecology. Given the critical roles of microbial interactions in microbial community assembly processes, realizing the controllability of microbial community functions needs to employ network controlling theory to detect key vertices to control. Many engineering microbial strains performed well in laboratory experiments but are difficult to apply in practical environments (15). Understanding the controllability of microbial ecological networks could support improving their performances in practical environments by manipulating interaction networks of microbial communities.

In conclusion, network analysis is a valuable approach for comprehensively understanding microbial community structure and functions. However, researchers in systems microbiology have a long way to go to catch up with the advanced developments in network science.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge the following funding sources: Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation (LD19D060001) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018QNA6009).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received February 19, 2019.
    • Accepted April 5, 2019.
  • Copyright © 2019 Lv et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Song C,
    2. Qu Z,
    3. Blumm N,
    4. Barabási A-L
    . 2010. Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science 327:1018–1021. doi:10.1126/science.1177170.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Barabási A-L
    . 2009. Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond. Science 325:412–413. doi:10.1126/science.1173299.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Barabasi A-L,
    2. Oltvai ZN
    . 2004. Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5:101–113. doi:10.1038/nrg1272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Barabási A-L
    . 2016. Network science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Faust K,
    2. Raes J
    . 2012. Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:538–550. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2832.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Röttjers L,
    2. Faust K
    . 2018. From hairballs to hypotheses–biological insights from microbial networks. FEMS Microbiol Rev 42:761–780. doi:10.1093/femsre/fuy030.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Weiss S,
    2. Van Treuren W,
    3. Lozupone C,
    4. Faust K,
    5. Friedman J,
    6. Deng Y,
    7. Xia LC,
    8. Xu ZZ,
    9. Ursell L,
    10. Alm EJ,
    11. Birmingham A,
    12. Cram JA,
    13. Fuhrman JA,
    14. Raes J,
    15. Sun F,
    16. Zhou J,
    17. Knight R
    . 2016. Correlation detection strategies in microbial data sets vary widely in sensitivity and precision. ISME J 10:1669–1681. doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.235.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Feizi S,
    2. Marbach D,
    3. Médard M,
    4. Kellis M
    . 2013. Network deconvolution as a general method to distinguish direct dependencies in networks. Nat Biotechnol 31:726–733. doi:10.1038/nbt.2635.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Barzel B,
    2. Barabási A-L
    . 2013. Network link prediction by global silencing of indirect correlations. Nat Biotechnol 31:720–725. doi:10.1038/nbt.2601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lima-Mendez G,
    2. Faust K,
    3. Henry N,
    4. Decelle J,
    5. Colin S,
    6. Carcillo F,
    7. Chaffron S,
    8. Ignacio-Espinosa JC,
    9. Roux S,
    10. Vincent F,
    11. Bittner L,
    12. Darzi Y,
    13. Wang J,
    14. Audic S,
    15. Berline L,
    16. Bontempi G,
    17. Cabello AM,
    18. Coppola L,
    19. Cornejo-Castillo FM,
    20. d’Ovidio F,
    21. Meester LD,
    22. Ferrera I,
    23. Garet-Delmas M-J,
    24. Guidi L,
    25. Lara E,
    26. Pesant S,
    27. Royo-Llonch M,
    28. Salazar G,
    29. Sánchez P,
    30. Sebastian M,
    31. Souffreau C,
    32. Dimier C,
    33. Picheral M,
    34. Searson S,
    35. Kandels-Lewis S, Tara Oceans Coordinators,
    36. Gorsky G,
    37. Not F,
    38. Ogata H,
    39. Speich S,
    40. Stemmann L,
    41. Weissenbach J,
    42. Wincker P,
    43. Acinas SG,
    44. Sunagawa S,
    45. Bork P,
    46. Sullivan MB,
    47. Karsenti E,
    48. Bowler C,
    49. de Vargas C,
    50. Raes J
    . 2015. Determinants of community structure in the global plankton interactome. Science 348:1262073. doi:10.1126/science.1262073.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Faust K,
    2. Lahti L,
    3. Gonze D,
    4. de Vos WM,
    5. Raes J
    . 2015. Metagenomics meets time series analysis: unraveling microbial community dynamics. Curr Opin Microbiol 25:56–66. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2015.04.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Blainey PC
    . 2013. The future is now: single-cell genomics of bacteria and archaea. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:407–427. doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Stanley CE,
    2. Grossmann G,
    3. Casadevall i Solvas X,
    4. deMello AJ
    . 2016. Soil-on-a-Chip: microfluidic platforms for environmental organismal studies. Lab Chip 16:228–241. doi:10.1039/C5LC01285F.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Liu Y-Y,
    2. Slotine J-J,
    3. Barabási A-L
    . 2011. Controllability of complex networks. Nature 473:167–173. doi:10.1038/nature10011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Faust K
    . 2019. Microbial consortium design benefits from metabolic modeling. Trends Biotechnol 37:123–125. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.11.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Strengthening Insights in Microbial Ecological Networks from Theory to Applications
Xiaofei Lv, Kankan Zhao, Ran Xue, Yuanhui Liu, Jianming Xu, Bin Ma
mSystems May 2019, 4 (3) e00124-19; DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00124-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSystems article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Strengthening Insights in Microbial Ecological Networks from Theory to Applications
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSystems
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSystems.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Strengthening Insights in Microbial Ecological Networks from Theory to Applications
Xiaofei Lv, Kankan Zhao, Ran Xue, Yuanhui Liu, Jianming Xu, Bin Ma
mSystems May 2019, 4 (3) e00124-19; DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00124-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • PERSPECTIVE
    • FILLING IN THE THEORY GAPS IN NETWORK INFERENCE AND INTERPRETATION
    • EVALUATING THE PREDICTED INTERACTIONS
    • HARNESSING MICROBIAL FUNCTIONS WITH MICROBIAL ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

evaluation
inference
interpretation
microbial ecological network
microbial interactions
network science

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSystems
  • Author Videos
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • Overleaf Pilot
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSystemsJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5077