Skip to main content
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Editor's Picks
    • Special Series: Sponsored Minireviews and Video Abstracts
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Novel Systems Biology Techniques
    • Early-Career Systems Microbiology Perspectives
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About mSystems
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM Journals
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mSystems
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Issues
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Editor's Picks
    • Special Series: Sponsored Minireviews and Video Abstracts
    • Archive
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Novel Systems Biology Techniques
    • Early-Career Systems Microbiology Perspectives
  • For Authors
    • Getting Started
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About mSystems
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Ecological and Evolutionary Science

Selection, Succession, and Stabilization of Soil Microbial Consortia

Elias K. Zegeye, Colin J. Brislawn, Yuliya Farris, Sarah J. Fansler, Kirsten S. Hofmockel, Janet K. Jansson, Aaron T. Wright, Emily B. Graham, Dan Naylor, Ryan S. McClure, Hans C. Bernstein
J. Gregory Caporaso, Editor
Elias K. Zegeye
aBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
bThe Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elias K. Zegeye
Colin J. Brislawn
aBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuliya Farris
aBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah J. Fansler
aBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirsten S. Hofmockel
cEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
dDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janet K. Jansson
aBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron T. Wright
aBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
bThe Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aaron T. Wright
Emily B. Graham
aBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emily B. Graham
Dan Naylor
aBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan S. McClure
aBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ryan S. McClure
Hans C. Bernstein
aBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
bThe Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA
eFaculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, UiT—The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
fThe Arctic Centre for Sustainable Energy, UiT—The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hans C. Bernstein
J. Gregory Caporaso
Northern Arizona University
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00055-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    The successional dynamics of microbial consortia. Differences in microbial community structure and alpha diversity are plotted with respect to native soil communities (labeled as “n”), the 6-week-chitin-enriched communities (labeled as “c”), uninoculated control (labeled as “control”), and different serial dilutions of NAG enrichment in liquid and soil treatments for 0 to 15 weeks. The results are partitioned by initial dilution and incubating conditions (NAG enrichment in liquid on the top and soil on the bottom). The most abundant bacterial (A) and fungal (B) phyla are shown over the 15-week incubation. The alpha diversities of bacteria (C) and fungi (D) were estimated using species richness and Simpson’s evenness.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    The influence of physical environment on taxonomic volatility, i.e., the tendency for the community to stabilize with respect to taxa being gained/lost over time. Each graph shows the weighted UniFrac distance for bacteria (A) and fungi (B) calculated between subsequent incubation times and plotted by weeks of incubation, dilution factor, and treatment conditions.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    The biological and physical variables correlated with beta diversity. Ordinations present canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) of weighted UniFrac distances between samples. The percent variation captured by the vectors is shown on each axis. Each vector has a magnitude (length) and direction of a variable’s contributions to the principal components. Vectors represent respiration (CO2 per hour) (orange), volatility (red), and the most abundant phyla (purple).

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • FIG S1

    The most abundant bacterial (A) and fungal (B) phyla are plotted for the native soil (labeled as “n”) and the 6-week-chitin-enriched soil (labeled as “c”). The alpha diversities of bacteria (C) and fungi (D) were estimated using species richness and Simpson’s evenness. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Zegeye et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    Rate of respiration varies over time based on dilution and physical environment. The respiration rate was plotted for both liquid (top) and soil (bottom) for NAG enrichment cultures from weeks 2 through 7 to avoid the light spike in CO2 released immediately after inoculation. Respiration was monitored three times a week with a PP Systems (Amesbury, MA) EGM-4 environmental gas monitor. The gas analyzer was set up in static mode to measure CO2 and monitor respiration in each sample at periodic intervals. To measure CO2, a 10-ml gas aliquot was taken from the incubation container using a sterile plastic syringe with a control valve. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Zegeye et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    Bacterial OTUs observed from 16S rRNA gene amplicon products in uninoculated controls. The most abundant OTUs shown in the controls were also found in the other samples. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.09 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Zegeye et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S1

    Final richness significantly varies between dilutions. Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test was performed to compare the richness between dilutions, and the P values are shown here. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Zegeye et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S4

    Patterns of variation within sample groups and within replicates. (A) Beta dispersion (within sample group variation) varies among time points as shown by the pairwise permutation test for homogeneity of multivariate dispersion at each time. Pairwise comparisons of the observed P values are tabulated for both the 16S and ITS for liquid and soil treatment conditions and indicate significant difference of within group dispersion. (B) A linear regression fit to the pairwise distance between replicates also shows changes in dispersion over time. The different dilutions are shown in separate facets and are used as strata during the permutation testing of beta dispersion. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 2.9 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Zegeye et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    The adonis test (permutational multivariate analysis of variance using distance matrices) was used to partition variation associated with dilution in the final time points from each treatment condition. The R2 column reports the percentage of weighted Unifrac distance that can be attributed to differing dilution. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Zegeye et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S3

    Outputs from the tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions performed with respect to each treatment. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Zegeye et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Selection, Succession, and Stabilization of Soil Microbial Consortia
Elias K. Zegeye, Colin J. Brislawn, Yuliya Farris, Sarah J. Fansler, Kirsten S. Hofmockel, Janet K. Jansson, Aaron T. Wright, Emily B. Graham, Dan Naylor, Ryan S. McClure, Hans C. Bernstein
mSystems May 2019, 4 (4) e00055-19; DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00055-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mSystems article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Selection, Succession, and Stabilization of Soil Microbial Consortia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mSystems
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mSystems.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Selection, Succession, and Stabilization of Soil Microbial Consortia
Elias K. Zegeye, Colin J. Brislawn, Yuliya Farris, Sarah J. Fansler, Kirsten S. Hofmockel, Janet K. Jansson, Aaron T. Wright, Emily B. Graham, Dan Naylor, Ryan S. McClure, Hans C. Bernstein
mSystems May 2019, 4 (4) e00055-19; DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00055-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

chitin
microbial consortia
microbiome
microbiome stability
model microbiome
N-acetylglucosamine
species volatility
succession
fungi
soil microbiology

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mSystems
  • Author Videos
  • Board of Editors
  • Policies
  • Overleaf Pilot
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Types of Articles
  • Getting Started
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mSystemsJ

@ASMicrobiology

       

 

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2379-5077